• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Why are alleged molesters named?"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    You might if there is a risk of a criminal case being prejudiced.
    And there is a risk that mud sticks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Why should the molester not be? You don't get anonymity for murder, arson and other serious crimes?
    You might if there is a risk of a criminal case being prejudiced.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Why should the molester not be? You don't get anonymity for murder, arson and other serious crimes?
    I think he meant the person claiming to have been molested, not the molester. Certainly the link appears to say that.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    ...Its a serious accusation. The accuser remains anonymous. Why should the alleged molester not be?...
    Why should the molester not be? You don't get anonymity for murder, arson and other serious crimes?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Its a serious accusation. The accuser remains anonymous. Why should the alleged molester not be?

    Though we should be told how much both their houses are worth....
    It's a serious accusation indeed, but when was the DM interested in innocent until proven guilty? All it wants to do is say anything that will create money for its tax-dodging owners and help its worshippers believe it even more.
    Give it a day or two and it might print an apology.

    Here's another example (with the apology from 4 days later):

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic Why are alleged molesters named?

    Why are alleged molesters named?

    Harpist sex case accuser denies he made it up | Daily Mail Online

    Royal musician Danielle Perrettis accused of a string of sexual offences against the man when he was a teenager in the 1980s.

    Its a serious accusation. The accuser remains anonymous. Why should the alleged molester not be?

    Though we should be told how much both their houses are worth....

Working...
X