• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Armed US immigration officers stationed at British airports"

Collapse

  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    It need refuelling on the westbound route because, I believe, it cannot take off fully fuelled at LCY (because of the runway length or something). Also the winds are against when going West, so it needs a fuel stop. It's an Airbus A318, business class only, and I seem to remember it was on Google street view for a while, so you could have a look round inside.
    The welcome to Europe / none Schengen queue at Paris CDG last Monday wasn't much better. Thankfully I have priority and after a very brief chat skipped the entire queue (even the priority queue was 10 minutes long) to get landside to walk to my departure terminal...

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Doesn't this happen in Shannon already?
    Yes and Dublin.... It's why I would fly Aer Lingus to America...

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    A trade deal is a dog eat dog activity, not diplomatic

    Lets face it Britain is going to get eaten alive doing its trade deals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post
    Totally ridiculous.. Allowing a foreign power to bear arms in a civilian location on British soil...

    That is NOT on.

    Armed British police are already present at many (all?) airports in this country - that should be good enough.
    We already have French Gendarmerie /Customs Folkestone side of Chunnel - officers of which are usually armed - but can't find confirmation of what the agreement was with France about UK side officers

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post
    Totally ridiculous.. Allowing a foreign power to bear arms in a civilian location on British soil...

    That is NOT on.

    Armed British police are already present at many (all?) airports in this country - that should be good enough.
    You and your ilk voted for Brexit which is moving from being one of the 3 top dogs in Europe to becoming the de facto 51st state of the US.
    So deal with it.

    Unless you thought the UK would become a global player comparable in size to the US and UK?
    Last edited by sasguru; 10 July 2017, 11:12.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    I trust if they find themselves in a situation where they are left with no option than to draw arms, they'll be protected by immunity ?

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    Totally ridiculous.. Allowing a foreign power to bear arms in a civilian location on British soil...

    That is NOT on.

    Armed British police are already present at many (all?) airports in this country - that should be good enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    if a flight from London to NewYork needs a refueling stop in Ireland, how the heck does it then get from Ireland to Newyork without needing another refueling stop ?

    Milan.
    It need refuelling on the westbound route because, I believe, it cannot take off fully fuelled at LCY (because of the runway length or something). Also the winds are against when going West, so it needs a fuel stop. It's an Airbus A318, business class only, and I seem to remember it was on Google street view for a while, so you could have a look round inside.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    BA001 from London City to New York does a refuelling stop in Shannon. While the plane is being refuelled, passengers get off the plane and go through the US immigration processes and then get back on again
    if a flight from London to NewYork needs a refueling stop in Ireland, how the heck does it then get from Ireland to Newyork without needing another refueling stop ?

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Armed US immigration officers stationed at British airports under radical new plan that could drive up air fares and queues

    British holidaymakers visiting the US could be hit with higher air fares and extra security before boarding flights, under new plans for armed US immigration officers to be stationed at UK airports.

    The change, which would see transatlantic passengers clearing immigration formalities before boarding an aircraft, is being discussed in Washington and Whitehall with officials understood to be negotiating over the practicalities.

    Under the plans airlines could be forced to pay for US security staff and their families to live in the UK, meaning they are likely to pass these extra costs onto passengers travelling from Britain to the US.

    Passengers are also likely to be asked to leave more time between turning up at airports before flights, as they will have to undergo questioning by US security in addition to usual checks.

    Armed US immigration officers stationed at British airports under radical new plan that could drive up air fares and queues

    Doesn't this happen in Shannon already?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    A former contractor friend from the UK is married to an American. The family are furious of the ridiculous formalities and delays at the US border when traveling to and from the US.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Armed US immigration officers stationed at British airports under radical new plan that could drive up air fares and queues

    British holidaymakers visiting the US could be hit with higher air fares and extra security before boarding flights, under new plans for armed US immigration officers to be stationed at UK airports.

    The change, which would see transatlantic passengers clearing immigration formalities before boarding an aircraft, is being discussed in Washington and Whitehall with officials understood to be negotiating over the practicalities.

    Under the plans airlines could be forced to pay for US security staff and their families to live in the UK, meaning they are likely to pass these extra costs onto passengers travelling from Britain to the US.

    Passengers are also likely to be asked to leave more time between turning up at airports before flights, as they will have to undergo questioning by US security in addition to usual checks.

    Armed US immigration officers stationed at British airports under radical new plan that could drive up air fares and queues

    I've stopped travelling to the US, immigration was never much fun in the old days, but in the last decade it's become farcical. I remember at trip to California (admittedly a bloody long time ago), from landing at SFO to walking outside the terminal took about 25 mins. What would it be today, I wonder? A couple of days? A week?
    BiL is taking the kids to Florida in a couple of weeks, we think he's insane. At least the airport queues should prepare the girls for the visit to Disneyland...

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Is this because England is a muslim country ??

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Great idea! Why not have all security checks done on board? Anyone who is deemed a risk can be just chucked out of the plane while it's over the ocean. It will help feed endangered species of sharks too.
    If they catch terrorist it will be on sovereign US territory

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    If US wants to do extra checks then should do so inside their own airplanes upon boarding
    Great idea! Why not have all security checks done on board? Anyone who is deemed a risk can be just chucked out of the plane while it's over the ocean. It will help feed endangered species of sharks too.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X