• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is CUK a safe space for extremists?"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by No2politics View Post
    There is undeniable evidence that religion exists. That is true.
    For the avoidance of doubt, that was his point. Concerning evidence, plenty of people consider they have evidence that their religion is true. Same as some people believe homeopathy works - because "for me it does". Sure, there are some people and priests who prefer the whole "blind faith" thing as being more spiritual, but nonetheless, it is incorrect to categorise all religious people as believing without evidence. They at least believe they have evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • No2politics
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I think there's more evidence for the existence of religion.
    There is undeniable evidence that religion exists. That is true.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Dumbass
    I know you are, but what is Bee?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Bee View Post
    Well, again I'm not a saint, and I'm not telling you that I don't have dumbass responses for a dumbass question or don't have any dumbass responses at all (like everybody else), but you "forgot" to mention about the number of dumbass answers to my posts in professional forums. If any member disagrees or wants an explanation from my posts the basic rule would be asking or argue in a polite way, in this way, the result would be certainly different.
    Dumbass

    Leave a comment:


  • Bee
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Posters have asked you to explain but you refuse to.
    Don't try to turn the table with me, I have a good memory.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Bee View Post
    Well, again I'm not a saint, and I'm not telling you that I don't have dumbass responses for a dumbass question or don't have any dumbass responses at all (like everybody else), but you "forgot" to mention about the number of dumbass answers to my posts in professional forums. If any member disagrees or wants an explanation from my posts the basic rule would be asking or argue in a polite way, in this way, the result would be certainly different.
    Posters have asked you to explain but you refuse to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bee
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    The complaints about you refer to your dumbass responses in the professional forums.

    I think that we could be accused of being too lenient on that score...
    Well, again I'm not a saint, and I'm not telling you that I don't have dumbass responses for a dumbass question or don't have any dumbass responses at all (like everybody else), but you "forgot" to mention about the number of dumbass answers to my posts in professional forums. If any member disagrees or wants an explanation from my posts the basic rule would be asking or argue in a polite way, in this way, the result would be certainly different.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Bee View Post
    Good point.

    I can tell you that the mods are receiving complaints about me, in their mind, I'm aggressive when I answer them and I don't respond to the questions. I can imagine who fagots are, I'm not a saint but the members of this forum are so polite in a debate (irony) that I just laugh when I read the message.

    In this case, do you see extremisms or stupidity from that members?
    The complaints about you refer to your dumbass responses in the professional forums.

    I think that we could be accused of being too lenient on that score...

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Where do we stand with extremist Brexiters?
    Same as extremist Scexiters - entertainment fodder.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    <BR word>
    I don't think that's valid HTML markup

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Where do we stand with extremist Brexiters?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bee
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    What do you suggest and do you have evidence of more members with extreme views. Also can you define extremists so we all know we are talking about the same thing.

    For example I was accused of extreme views by a member when I said Muslim communities had a responsibility to integrate.
    Good point.

    I can tell you that the mods are receiving complaints about me, in their mind, I'm aggressive when I answer them and I don't respond to the questions. I can imagine who fagots are, I'm not a saint but the members of this forum are so polite in a debate (irony) that I just laugh when I read the message.

    In this case, do you see extremisms or stupidity from that members?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    We can all applaud the banning of diseasex, but should CUK do more to weed out extremists?
    You have to narrow down as to what type of extremists. Extremist fat bastards, extremist boring sockies, extremist PFY...

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    We can all applaud the banning of diseasex, but should CUK do more to weed out extremists?
    Like who?

    But as far as Christians are concerned - bring back the Test Acts, but rather that anyone with any kind of spiritual belief must be excluded from public office. Except Muslims of course, because that would be racist

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Religion is the belief in dieties, rather than the dieties themselves.
    I always thought it was:

    "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people."
    Which I suppose makes a lot of people agree with old Marx on here

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X