• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Should the EU be making progressive scientific constructions like this?"

Collapse

  • tomtomagain
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    the clever thing is, the location, imagine if that was located in the UK, all that investment, all those jobs, have a look on their web page, the "Project" has a 20 years timeline just to get to the point where they switch on the machine !!

    after Brexit there'll be no chance of Britain hosting projects like that.

    Shame, but, hey, exporting to the commonwealth and former Empire countries will more than make up for silly projects like that

    Milan.
    You mean like this? https://www.euro-fusion.org/jet/

    Or this? About Us - Diamond Light Source

    Or this? SKA Project | The University of Manchester | Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics

    Or this? Rutherford Appleton Laboratory - Science and Technology Facilities Council

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    There are probably only a thousand people in the world who would work on this sort of project, there are millions of builders.
    Although apparently there will be a few less in the UK soon

    Leave a comment:


  • squarepeg
    replied
    Impressive, but I like this clock better :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    the "Project" has a 20 years timeline just to get to the point where they switch on the machine !!
    I did the maths of this in final year at university. And then there were building a machine that would take 20 years to switch on.

    I have more faith in the church than that load of charlatans. I f**king hate the church....

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    its excellent I note the Beeb sent their historians over and made some great telly there

    BBC Two - Secrets of the Castle with Ruth, Peter and Tom

    but we got there first (after Kon Tiki)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butser_Ancient_Farm

    The Roundhouse Project

    and

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_archaeology
    Last edited by vetran; 16 May 2017, 15:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smartie
    replied
    Or this?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gu%C3%A9delon_Castle

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    and there is so much hot air here!
    [emoji8]

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post

    We are a global leader in wind technology. Long may it blow.
    and there is so much hot air here!

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Indeed, how likely is the UK to compete in the future for projects like this to be built on the little island? If you're in the customs union you've access to many many suppliers without red tape when crossing borders.
    Why not. Japan, Korea, and Russia all have smaller economies than the UK.

    http://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/und...er_parties.jpg

    Isn't CERN outside the European Union.

    Saudi Arabia are about to build a cyclotron.

    We are a global leader in wind technology. Long may it blow.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    Bob,

    you have a point, but the difference between using the money to build houses and using the money to experiment with the goal of finding this new form of cheap electricity is....

    Building a house just houses that family

    Do the experimental project for 50 years will employee the father who feeds the family and buys the house

    Therefore the investment in the Experimental Thingy is better for the economy

    Milan.
    There are probably only a thousand people in the world who would work on this sort of project, there are millions of builders.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    Bob,

    you have a point, but the difference between using the money to build houses and using the money to experiment with the goal of finding this new form of cheap electricity is....

    Building a house just houses that family

    Do the experimental project for 50 years will employee the father who feeds the family and buys the house

    Therefore the investment in the Experimental Thingy is better for the economy

    Milan.
    How many workers would it take to erect/modify the houses and the solar panels? Im guessing the kinds number of people that can work on nuclear fusion reactors are fairly small compared to the thousands of bread winners that can build a wall or re-roof a building.

    In an ideal world we should do both but seeing as there is already a sun there to provide the free energy today spending billions to re-create one is a little pointless.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Indeed, how likely is the UK to compete in the future for projects like this to be built on the little island? If you're in the customs union you've access to many many suppliers without red tape when crossing borders.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    Originally posted by bobspud View Post
    Hang on! for the cost of that project, how many houses could be:

    a) Provided solar panels like the Tesla roof?
    b) Be rebuilt entirely to a passive model that uses ground heat
    c) Mix of the above

    Yes its a great experiment to do but bang for buck the money should be else where

    Bob,

    you have a point, but the difference between using the money to build houses and using the money to experiment with the goal of finding this new form of cheap electricity is....

    Building a house just houses that family

    Do the experimental project for 50 years will employee the father who feeds the family and buys the house

    Therefore the investment in the Experimental Thingy is better for the economy

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    https://www.iter.org/

    looks good, why not invest in the future ?

    Milan.
    Hang on! for the cost of that project, how many houses could be:

    a) Provided solar panels like the Tesla roof?
    b) Be rebuilt entirely to a passive model that uses ground heat
    c) Mix of the above

    Yes its a great experiment to do but bang for buck the money should be else where

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    the clever thing is, the location, imagine if that was located in the UK, all that investment, all those jobs, have a look on their web page, the "Project" has a 20 years timeline just to get to the point where they switch on the machine !!

    after Brexit there'll be no chance of Britain hosting projects like that.

    Shame, but, hey, exporting to the commonwealth and former Empire countries will more than make up for silly projects like that

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X