• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The church is on your side"

Collapse

  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post



    Oooooaaarrrrr!!
    She looks American (us stereotypers are all the same )

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Somerset's lovely - cider and filthy wenches.



    Oooooaaarrrrr!!

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Then God could have modelled Hell on Somerset.............if indeed that is not already the case......as many believe.
    Somerset's lovely - cider and filthy wenches.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    If she'd turned it into scrumpy, got smashed on it and peed on a rose bush, fair enough.
    Then God could have modelled Hell on Somerset.............if indeed that is not already the case......as many believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    It's got to be the crappest of all bible stories - getting into deep tulip for having one of your five a day! If she'd turned it into scrumpy, got smashed on it and peed on a rose bush, fair enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Interesting. If I've got this right, Eve ate the apple and women were punished by having much smaller fufu's?
    To get Eve, it cost us a rib. To get something halfways decent and emotionally stable, that would have cost us an arm and a leg.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Interesting. If I've got this right, Eve ate the apple and women were punished by having much smaller fufu's?
    It wasn't an apple and who knows. Maybe our heads got bigger (within the story context obviously)

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    I'm pretty sure current evolutionary theory is that by standing up the pelvic cavity has to narrow. In time evolution will weed out those that die in child birth. Oh, hold on ...

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's unclear but in the story with Adam and Eve and the snake, God says "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children". So I suppose the system was the same but much less awkward... perhaps the way some animals just plop them out
    Interesting. If I've got this right, Eve ate the apple and women were punished by having much smaller fufu's?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    I'm sure we've all struggled with the business changing their requirements, but what, I have to ask, was the original 'plan' for childbirth?
    It's unclear but in the story with Adam and Eve and the snake, God says "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children". So I suppose the system was the same but much less awkward... perhaps the way some animals just plop them out

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But then what kind of female god would create periods and childbirth (I mean the bible explains the latter being a change to the original design but the former is as seemingly bad as what men have to carry around)
    I'm sure we've all struggled with the business changing their requirements, but what, I have to ask, was the original 'plan' for childbirth?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I don't know too much about him but he seems a good chap. A friend of mine got invited to attend an LGBT seminar/meeting/roundtable with him and said as much.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Excellent. I might even consider taking him off my Total W*ers List.

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheGreek
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    The C of E does not officially recognise marriages where one or both parties are reptilian.
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Nonsense. If that were the case just how do you explain Prince Philip?

    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    You don't. That is the point. I will say no more on the matter.
    You're happy enough with the old trouser snake when you're working, sweetheart.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But then what kind of female god would create periods and childbirth (I mean the bible explains the latter being a change to the original design but the former is as seemingly bad as what men have to carry around)
    Ah, now then. It's very simple. A kick in the nuts must hurt mort than childbirth. Women want another child; I've yet to hear a man (NLyUK's clientele aside) ask to be kicked in the nuts again.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X