• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I hope this is true"

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    True. There were also loads of websites that broke when Internet Explorer 5 came out as they checked the browser version string for a "4" in the correct position and assumed if it was some other character you must be using something like Netscape Navigator 3.

    Then when browser versions broke the 10 mark, loads more sites couldn't cope as although they parsed the version number as a numeric value, they only looked at a single character from the string representation ("1" in that case) and assumed you were on a really old version

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I heard it was third party tools rather than ms code.
    I'm sure that's what MS would like us all to think, not that they were a victim of much cheapness.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I heard it was third party tools rather than ms code.
    yep seen that.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    I heard it was third party tools rather than ms code.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    'Windaz 9' would have worked. Or Windaz IX

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Classic

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    It was.
    +1

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    It was.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    started a topic I hope this is true

    I hope this is true

Working...
X