• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Half of new homes built in Britain the next five years will go to migrants"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    If they can afford to buy a house they're welcome!
    They can't

    Half a million immigrants given social housing in the last decade - Telegraph

    The news comes as the waiting list for social housing hits a record 1.8million, most of whom are British born.
    Four million migrants arrived in Britain between 2001 and 2011, and of those 469,843 were allocated council or housing association properties, according to national census statistics released yesterday
    Around 1.2million immigrants now live in social housing. They account for around one in eight of the total occupants, with the figure even higher in London, thought to be as much as one in five.

    The other thing is that they may well be more able to afford houses as they are more likely to turn them into dormitories or illegal HMOs whether that be a slum landlord or a person sub letting to their mates.


    Whenever the slum landlord shows a raid on illegal properties very few are inhabited by people called Cressida or Rupert.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If they can afford to buy a house they're welcome!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    This is exactly the point, agree with this. It's all about communities insisting on ID's to claim benefits, get a job etc and clamping down on illegal employment, benefit cheats etc.

    I lived in Luxembourg which is a tiny country of several thousand people, where you could argue it will be "swamped" by 500 million would be immigrants as there was no border control. Yet you barely saw a tramp.
    They obviously heard about you living there

    Quota plan crisis as refugees refuse to go to Luxembourg | The Times

    Syrian asylum seekers in Greece have refused to be relocated to Luxembourg, pushing the European Union’s scheme for migrant quotas close to collapse.
    The Times understands that plans to relocate 30 Syrians from Greece to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, one of Europe’s wealthiest countries, have been shelved because “very many” of them want to go to Germany instead.
    Economic migrants hey?


    But Luxembourg is trying

    ‘Soon there will be no more Luxembourg’ – POLITICO

    The Grand Duchy has volunteered to take in about 400 refugees in the next couple of years

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The example I've always heard used is walking across the mountains bordering France and Spain, the Pyrenees. Very easy to do in Summer if you are fit as it's impossible to put border guards on all the paths.

    The Norway - Russia one I was amazed by as people were cycling across in winter, and their winters aren't like ours.

    Anyway Schengen just formalised what was being done already. Unlike in the UK the police can stop you in other Europe countries and ask you for ID, which you have to have on you.
    This is exactly the point, agree with this. It's all about communities insisting on ID's to claim benefits, get a job etc and clamping down on illegal employment, benefit cheats etc.

    I lived in Luxembourg which is a tiny country of several thousand people, where you could argue it will be "swamped" by 500 million would be immigrants as there was no border control. Yet you barely saw a tramp.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    There is a myth that before Schengen there was barbed wire circled around all European countries. You could always walk across a border in a remote field. That's why when Brits rail about Schengen, they're spouting nonsense. The UK has the most illegal immigrants and it isn't even in Schengen. It's a bit like Trump banning muslims from countries in which he doesn't have a Trump chain hotel. Doesn't make sense but the voters like it.

    The example I've always heard used is walking across the mountains bordering France and Spain, the Pyrenees. Very easy to do in Summer if you are fit as it's impossible to put border guards on all the paths.

    The Norway - Russia one I was amazed by as people were cycling across in winter, and their winters aren't like ours.

    Anyway Schengen just formalised what was being done already. Unlike in the UK the police can stop you in other Europe countries and ask you for ID, which you have to have on you.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Even without Schengen it's possible to walk across Europe.

    It is harder as you would only be able to do it in summer to ensure you avoided routes with border guards but still possible. For example look for stories on those crossing from Russia to Norway.
    There is a myth that before Schengen there was barbed wire circled around all European countries. You could always walk across a border in a remote field. That's why when Brits rail about Schengen, they're spouting nonsense. The UK has the most illegal immigrants and it isn't even in Schengen. It's a bit like Trump banning muslims from countries in which he doesn't have a Trump chain hotel. Doesn't make sense but the voters like it.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    It's in the Daily Mail Telegraph so it must be true!
    5.3 million new homes needed as ageing and immigration drive demand 

    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    It's in the Daily Mail so it must be true!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Even without Schengen it's possible to walk across Europe.

    It is harder as you would only be able to do it in summer to ensure you avoided routes with border guards but still possible. For example look for stories on those crossing from Russia to Norway.
    all things are possible but the harder it is the less likely.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    If the EU & Schengen didn't exist the migrants that have walked etc across Europe would be stuck at the Turkish / Greek border and we would have sent all those that come from the Calais Jungle straight back to France.

    Good to see you are still capable of Cretinism of the highest level.
    Even without Schengen it's possible to walk across Europe.

    It is harder as you would only be able to do it in summer to ensure you avoided routes with border guards but still possible. For example look for stories on those crossing from Russia to Norway.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Since we are not in Schengen, probably close to 0%.
    If we were in Schengen, the migrant camps in Calais would not exist, since they wpuld be able to walk straight through.

    FFS your command of geography and politics is abysmal.
    If the EU & Schengen didn't exist the migrants that have walked etc across Europe would be stuck at the Turkish / Greek border and we would have sent all those that come from the Calais Jungle straight back to France.

    Good to see you are still capable of Cretinism of the highest level.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    and what proportion of those came through the EU?
    Since we are not in Schengen, probably close to 0%.
    If we were in Schengen, the migrant camps in Calais would not exist, since they wpuld be able to walk straight through.

    FFS your command of geography and politics is abysmal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Halo Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
    I think the big pity is that the Leave result seems to have been interpreted as a poll on immigration. A lot of Leavers I talked to just wanted to get rid of any control by Brussels.
    This, for me, is the big issue; votes for the referendum were cast on both sides for a variety of reasons.

    No one really knows what the drivers were that made people vote either way, & politicians & media are claiming what ever scenario suits their own political views.

    The situation was too complex for a simple yes / no referendum

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Oh those Russians....
    The ones working in Eat?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    How many immigrants can afford a £400k house?
    Oh those Russians....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X