• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Criminal Justice System values money over life"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    The difference here is that one is a judge. One is not.

    Judge Selwood, a family court judge, was caught with indecent photographs of children that he had taken himself. His penalty - to retire.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    You're missing the point of the other offence. The judiciary have to regulate themselves so when people abuse that position the sentences are very heavy 'pour encourager les autres'.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The driver would have been guilty and it would be a driving offence.
    only if he were driving dangerously.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post

    If the guys had maintained their vehicle to an acceptable standard and something unexpected broke and killed the people - what is the verdict?
    The driver would have been guilty and it would be a driving offence.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    If the guys had maintained their vehicle to an acceptable standard and something unexpected broke and killed the people - what is the verdict?
    The other question is what if the brakes were dodgy but nobody was hurt?

    It's always a little sad in these cases that it's only punished if somebody gets killed. Surely the penalty for wrongdoing should be the same regardless of whether or not you're unlucky enough to kill someone?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post

    If the guys had maintained their vehicle to an acceptable standard and something unexpected broke and killed the people - what is the verdict?
    Accident, In this case it appears only 1 of the 6 brake cylinders was working, I imagine they are like old fashioned brakes and they just gum / rust up, should take 30 minutes to replace one or repair the rubbers.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    Two very different crimes, but similar sentences. Just goes to show how the criminal justice system focuses on money and property more than peoples' lives.

    I believe that anyone who directly or indirectly causes the death of another person through deliberate acts or negligence should be put away for decades, not a few years.
    I would be all for tagging the fraudsters, the embarrassment would be far more suitable than prison.

    Whilst I'm all for punishing the shoddy workmanship my understanding is there are regular official inspections as well as by the mechanic not sure how this was missed then.

    The Drivers are told to ignore faults & drive without tachos (a few have told me this) so its about time we clamped down on this & Servicing.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    It is very generally why there is a distinction between manslaughter and murder.

    And it boils down to intent.

    Those guys did not intend to kill anyone but by their negligence they did - Manslaughter.

    If those guys deliberately planned to drive into people and kill them - murder

    Interesting question

    If the guys had maintained their vehicle to an acceptable standard and something unexpected broke and killed the people - what is the verdict?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    Why not? They deliberately didn't maintain their vehicles properly (ok, that wasn't in my quote), which resulted in the deaths of four people. Responsibility doesn't change just because they didn't kill the people directly themselves.
    I'm not disagreeing they should have gotten more.. But if you want to argue it you've got to look at the law and then it becomes a minefield, which was where you were going in your post.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    But there is a problem right there. You can't lump an indirect crime through negligence with a direct crime that was deliberate together. As soon as you do your argument just falls around your ears.
    Why not? They deliberately didn't maintain their vehicles properly (ok, that wasn't in my quote), which resulted in the deaths of four people. Responsibility doesn't change just because they didn't kill the people directly themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    I believe that anyone who directly or indirectly causes the death of another person through deliberate acts or negligence should be put away for decades, not a few years.
    But there is a problem right there. You can't lump an indirect crime through negligence with a direct crime that was deliberate together. As soon as you do your argument just falls around your ears.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    started a topic Criminal Justice System values money over life

    Criminal Justice System values money over life

    A haulage boss and a mechanic have been jailed following a 2015 tipper truck crash that killed four people in Bath.
    Matthew Gordon and Peter Wood were sentenced at Bristol Crown Court to seven and a-half years and five years three months, respectively.
    A former deputy judge and his assistant have both been jailed for six years after defrauding more than £600,000 from their law firm's clients.
    Two very different crimes, but similar sentences. Just goes to show how the criminal justice system focuses on money and property more than peoples' lives.

    I believe that anyone who directly or indirectly causes the death of another person through deliberate acts or negligence should be put away for decades, not a few years.
Working...
X