Originally posted by NigelJK
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Justice for the Kinsley Three
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Justice for the Kinsley Three"
Collapse
-
Is it not a matter of principal, though? Sadly, there exists a huge number of employers who would gladly operate under Victorian conditions given a mere half a chance. It's taken many years to get to a point where workers are, for the most part, treated fairly and correctly but it doesn't take much to start undoing it if employers are left to get away with treating people like a cheap commodity.
-
On Thursday the drivers and conductors weren't on strike but there were insufficient staff to run a full train service.Originally posted by sal View PostMy thoughts exactly. Now apply the same treatment to the Southern drivers/conductors.
Southern needs to hire more staff but why should they when the government (or us, the taxpayer,) will pay them regardless.
Oh and other train companies do hire the staff needed to run a railway. In fact some holding more than one franchise can move their staff around if one lot strikes.
Leave a comment:
-
My thoughts exactly. Now apply the same treatment to the Southern drivers/conductors.In one email seen by the Guardian, the company’s head of human resources, Nick Thorpe, replied to Unison: “I understand … the impact for you as an organisation when members realise that we are no longer living in the 1980s and they question the actual value of union membership when you have no say, power or influence over their employer.”
Edit: Now I sympathize with the unfortunate Trio, but they chose the wrong approach for fighting thisLast edited by sal; 23 December 2016, 15:30.
Leave a comment:
-
Council ineptitude.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostSo is it Thatcher's fault or thick Brexiters this time?
Leave a comment:
-
It was supposed to be covered by TUPE, but the council screwed up the documentation and the company refused to accept the evidence supplied by the employees. Usual ineptitude and greed.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't know where to start with that. Striking when you're working for a private outfit is a very different proposition to doing it when you're part of the taxpayer payroll. And for 14 weeks. When your losses are around £20. I'm betting that they all had to reapply for their positions when the private co took over.
Leave a comment:
-
Justice for the Kinsley Three
So this is what happens for workers who stand up for their rights - they get sacked. LinkyTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Leave a comment: