• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IMF led by convicted criminal."

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    I heard that she didn't inhale.
    Yet blaster expects us to swallow that codswallop!

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    I heard that she didn't inhale.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    George Osborne, Christine Largarde, Hilary Clinton all part of the same rotten crew who'd try and run the planet if we let them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Lets be honest most people posting here have probably been convicted at some point of a minor traffic offence, handled by the criminal courts. You had point on your licence then you have had a conviction.



    We have a winner. The Post of 2016 !

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    OK. Well please feel free to remove the word 'criminal' from the thread title if it isn't correct.
    Nope. I'm not covering up your basic inability to apprehend facts (and, apparently, read).

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    She was convicted of negligence by a French court.

    What does that make her in France?
    Fit for High Office?

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Lets be honest most people posting here have probably been convicted at some point of a minor traffic offence, handled by the criminal courts. You had point on your licence then you have had a conviction.
    That's a bit different to misuse of £340m isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Lets be honest most people posting here have probably been convicted at some point of a minor traffic offence, handled by the criminal courts. You had point on your licence then you have had a conviction.
    She has half a million points on her license.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Allowing the misuse of public funds is not like parking badly.
    It is in the EUSSRR Comerade!

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Lets be honest most people posting here have probably been convicted at some point of a minor traffic offence, handled by the criminal courts. You had point on your licence then you have had a conviction.

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    No, when the judge decides, under French law, that it was not a criminal act.

    Guilty of negligence, but not a criminal.
    Accused of allowing the misuse of public funds, rather than actual corruption, she could potentially have been sentenced to a year in prison and a fine of €15,000 but escaped a sentence and emerges from the trial without a criminal record.

    You see, different countries have different laws, which allow things to be a bit a different from how they are in England and Wales. For example, in Scotland, there is a verdict of "not proven", as opposed to the binary Guilty/Not Guilty.
    OK. Well please feel free to remove the word 'criminal' from the thread title if it isn't correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    A French court has found International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde guilty of negligence

    Maybe Darren Upton should appeal and say he is guilty only of bad parking.
    Probably more similar to careless driving and causing damage to some expensive property,

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    so when is a conviction not criminal when prosecuted by the state?
    No, when the judge decides, under French law, that it was not a criminal act.

    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    She was convicted of negligence by a French court.

    What does that make her in France?
    Guilty of negligence, but not a criminal.
    Accused of allowing the misuse of public funds, rather than actual corruption, she could potentially have been sentenced to a year in prison and a fine of €15,000 but escaped a sentence and emerges from the trial without a criminal record.

    You see, different countries have different laws, which allow things to be a bit a different from how they are in England and Wales. For example, in Scotland, there is a verdict of "not proven", as opposed to the binary Guilty/Not Guilty.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    I''ll give you a hint:

    Criminal Records and the CRB - InBrief.co.uk



    Her conviction is not on the criminal record in the same way that a motoring offence isn't.
    Allowing the misuse of public funds is not like parking badly.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Just want to point out she's not actually a convicted criminal, no more than someone with a parking fine is.

    Still if keeps the Daily Mail readers happy in their fantasy world.

    A French court has found International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde guilty of negligence

    Maybe Darren Upton should appeal and say he is guilty only of bad parking.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X