Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Autumn Statement 2016
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Autumn Statement 2016"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostDoes anyone know how you pay into a pension out of this public sector farce. With the new drawdown rules seems the best way to save some extra dosh up.
Leave a comment:
-
Pensions
Does anyone know how you pay into a pension out of this public sector farce. With the new drawdown rules seems the best way to save some extra dosh up.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
Draft legislation was supposed to have been published yesterday but I've not found a link to it yet. Anyone?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ContractorBanking View PostIs there any clarity on the "goods" test for FRS?
I thought I read in CUK the goods test would be revealed on 5th Dec - have I missed something?
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...technical-note
Unless I'm mis-remembering, this stuff seems new:
Goods must be used exclusively for the purpose of the business - this means that you must not include the cost of any goods that are used in full or in part for your own private use. For example, printer ink and stationery that are used for both your office and your home would not be included. It would also exclude goods acquired with the intention of giving them away or donating them to a third party.
Also, it would seem that buying hardware and choosing not to capitalise it in your accounts is going to be a non-starter too, because the definition of capital goods is the one used for VAT purposes, regardless of your accounting treatment:
Examples include equipment such as a computer, mobile phone, office furniture, a tablet or a printer, even if they are not necessarily treated as capital assets for accounting purposes. The legislation that describes capital expenditure goods can be found in VAT Regulations 1995, 55A (1).Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 6 December 2016, 17:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Is there any clarity on the "goods" test for FRS?
I thought I read in CUK the goods test would be revealed on 5th Dec - have I missed something?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostI'm an equal opportunities eliminator in that respect
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View PostI will let you off then!
True, but as your legal employer we have an obligation to make payment to you (if the brolly is acting compliantly based on the Contract of Employment), plus we handle the credit control so you have no issues in chasing up payments. I would say as long as the contractor does their research and uses a "decent, reputable brolly" that has been around for a decent amount of time, then their money should be in safe hands!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostIn the interests of balance, it's also worth bearing in mind that an umbrella company is another link in the chain that can fail, so even if it's cost neutral when the 5% allowance and FRS profit is gone, it isn't risk neutral. This is a general observation, not a specific one aimed at CU.
True, but as your legal employer we have an obligation to make payment to you (if the brolly is acting compliantly based on the Contract of Employment), plus we handle the credit control so you have no issues in chasing up payments. I would say as long as the contractor does their research and uses a "decent, reputable brolly" that has been around for a decent amount of time, then their money should be in safe hands!
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed. And with no bias or view one way or the other... I am always personally sceptical of a person or company which says "better of or the same going through us" - if this was true, how does the person or the company stay in business if they don't make any money? And if they do make money, where does that money come from?
Leave a comment:
-
In the interests of balance, it's also worth bearing in mind that an umbrella company is another link in the chain that can fail, so even if it's cost neutral when the 5% allowance and FRS profit is gone, it isn't risk neutral. This is a general observation, not a specific one aimed at CU.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jonnyboy View PostCan you show us your calculations?
Nothing hidden from this end, so you will see the taxes etc and as I mentioned our weekly or monthly margin will cover a £20m insurance package for you, plus don't forget you get statutory entitlements as an employee that you wouldn't through your own Ltd company.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostHow do brolly fees stack up against costs for accountancy, insurances etc? As a very rough estimate these come out to around £2,500 pa for me.
Accountants = £80pm = £960. I use freeagent (no costs for me) so accountants cost is for checking things through, year end sign off, questions, etc
Insurance (stat) = £350. For the mandatory twin insurance
Insurance (opt) = £299. This is for QDOS tax insurance
Thats £1609 (excluding VAT) - what else is in your £2,500??
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View PostWhen the mentions of the Public PSC legislation was bounded around in the round-table events at HMRC, there was still a perceived benefit of Ltd with the flat rate scheme, and the 5% expenses, but it appears the removal of these would mean operating through a Ltd gives no added bonus over umbrella. At least going umbrella means your insurances are covered and you have no paperwork hassle other than timesheets. If you know anyone in this situation, feel free to mention us
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: