Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Vote of No Confidence in NAT
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Vote of No Confidence in NAT"
Collapse
-
I still think my "infraction" was a tad harsh.
NLUK, can you put in a good word?
qh
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think I still retain the record and of longest ban on CUK?
Until you unban AndyW....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostI had to put in a good word for him first though...
Leave a comment:
-
This is what happens when NAT goes soft and reverses his decision? Next time he will extend the ban to spite you all! I hope you all get 2 day bans...
PS it is still us and them!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by administrator View PostI backed down on a ban once. It took 18 months of grovelling but I eventually let Brillo back in. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Leave a comment:
-
I backed down on a ban once. It took 18 months of grovelling but I eventually let Brillo back in. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostExactly. NLUK is so far up NAT's arse he can almost see SueEllen's ankles!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostFirst rule of a General never apologise. Now, I've just seen a mod bow down to peer pressure and reverse a ban, and apologise.
You people make me sick. Should have had the posters shot instead and then call it collateral damage.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Today 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
Leave a comment: