Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Interesting clientco situation!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Interesting clientco situation!"
Collapse
-
Interesting?
When was the dictionary definition of interesting changed to utterly boring and tedious....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostHad an email from an agent last night about a diluted version of my current contract with a third of the rate. This role would report to myself, but I have not heard anything about it.
While I am in a public sector project I am working for a tin-pot 2 man consultancy who needed my skillset to get things progressed. I am contracted to November with a weeks notice. I have good processes and shaped things up well over my five weeks here, there is now a good roadmap for a better chance of success.
Either the public sector HR are trying to swap me for a cheaper version, or the consultancy I am working for are trying to swap me out to pocket a heck of a difference for themselves.
I am looking but to be honest am ready for a good holiday. Last time I work for a small firm – lesson learnt.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostYep, aggro indeed. Thankfully I am through a good agent who pays weekly so the money is coming through. I would not have taken the role otherwise. My agent seem to know nothing but I will bide out the week and see what happens if anything. Even a graduate would not work for pro-rata council salary on a day rate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostYep, aggro indeed. Thankfully I am through a good agent who pays weekly so the money is coming through. I would not have taken the role otherwise. My agent seem to know nothing but I will bide out the week and see what happens if anything. Even a graduate would not work for pro-rata council salary on a day rate.
Leave a comment:
-
Wilslow Interesting does not correspond to other peoples definition of interesting.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How much tax to pay HMRC on cryptocurrency? Yesterday 10:00
- Life Insurance services Jan 15 10:21
- Relevant Life Insurance Services Jan 15 10:08
- Will umbrella company regulation spark mergers and acquisitions? Jan 15 09:24
- Critical Illness Insurance for Contractors: Protect Yourself When It Matters Most Jan 14 16:26
- Relevant Life Insurance for Contractors with a Limited Company Jan 14 16:14
- Life Insurance for Contractors: Why it’s Essential Jan 14 16:09
- Guide to Income Protection Insurance for Contractors Jan 14 16:00
- Treasury minister told six actions can save contractor umbrella sector from ‘existential’ crisis Jan 14 09:40
- Critical Illness Services Jan 13 16:41
Leave a comment: