• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mr Blair has apologised for mistakes he made"

Collapse

  • NigelJK
    replied
    Revenge for only being allowed 2 jags. He wanted 3 one peerage, like all good Socialists.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    LOL.

    Those medical records are locked away for 70 years, if we are talking about David Kelly's.

    Wonder why

    I was thinking more about the "findings" of Hutton...

    That Andrew Gilligan was wrong - allegations he made against the government were "unfounded".
    His report claimed that claims made in Tony Blair's intelligence dossier on Iraq - that Saddam Hussein could launch attacks with weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes - were probably known to be wrong by the government before they were placed in the dossier.

    That the management of the BBC failed to check the details of Mr Gilligan's story as soon as the government complained that it had raised grave charges against them.

    That the resulting resignations of BBC executives and employees were unnecessary because the findings were false.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    So does this open up the Hutton Inquiry again? After all it said TB was an angel and the BBC were liars.
    LOL.

    Those medical records are locked away for 70 years, if we are talking about David Kelly's.

    Wonder why

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    After the first 5 seconds, Bliar wouldn't feel a thing
    Apart from the wet patch...

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    I guess he never watched Wag the Dog.
    Nah, most of those old black and white kids' programmes were a bit before my time.

    But I do just about remember Bill and Ben the Flowerpot Men

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    So does this open up the Hutton Inquiry again? After all it said TB was an angel and the BBC were liars.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I guess he never watched Wag the Dog.
    Probably only watches Shag the WAG.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    New to David Kelly?
    I guess he never watched Wag the Dog.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I've never really understood all this Blair hatred.

    It was the Septics who screwed up in Iraq and Libya. All Blair did (albeit somewhat deceitfully it seems) was get the UK into the party, to bolster our relationship with the US. That sounds to me pretty patriotic and commendable on a strategic level at least, however messy the whole campaign has turned out since.

    Yes, I know Harold Wilson kept the UK out of the Vietnam War, and arguably Blair should have done the same with Iraq. But Iraq was different, because unlike Vietnam it was a traditional area where the UK had been heavily involved not long before.

    But I'm certainly not a fan of TB after he mentioned last week the possibility of a second EU referendum!
    New to David Kelly?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    I've never really understood all this Blair hatred.

    It was the Septics who screwed up in Iraq and Libya. All Blair did (albeit somewhat deceitfully it seems) was get the UK into the party, to bolster our relationship with the US. That sounds to me pretty patriotic and commendable on a strategic level at least, however messy the whole campaign has turned out since.

    Yes, I know Harold Wilson kept the UK out of the Vietnam War, and arguably Blair should have done the same with Iraq. But Iraq was different, because unlike Vietnam it was a traditional area where the UK had been heavily involved not long before.

    But I'm certainly not a fan of TB after he mentioned last week the possibility of a second EU referendum!

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    I was hearing on the radio that one of the problems was he was saying one thing to George Dubya and another to parliament for about a year.

    And ultimately what he was saying to George Dubya was what happened.

    I think he could be in a bit of bovver and he really should be - seems like a huge abuse of position to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    John Prescott has left Blair wide open after his weekend declaration:
    Chilcot report: John Prescott says Iraq War was illegal | UK Politics | News | The Independent
    Revenge for only being allowed 2 jags. He wanted 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    John Prescott has left Blair wide open after his weekend declaration:
    Chilcot report: John Prescott says Iraq War was illegal | UK Politics | News | The Independent

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Based on the title of this thread, I thought it was going to be Leo Blair apologising for not wearing a condom 64 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    No-one in parliament will sanction him. They will be too worried they might get sanctioned themselves in the future.
    Yep. Setting a dangerous precedent.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X