Yes they could have spent that on their NHS
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Countries preparing trade talks with the UK"
Collapse
-
-
And now gentlemen, I must leave you and do some work.
For my French client.
We're not going to save this country by chit-chatting you know.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI am not sure that the remainers have the wit to work out that the EU is an institution that represents a form of European integration. It is the incumbent so called governing body but it is not the de facto representation of Europe or European interests (far from it). Many Breixiters want EU integration but not on the terms currently on offer from the EU. It is a bit like having a software house that is entrenched into a company that makes change difficult and creates an infrastructure on which everyone relies upon. The supplier then begins to boss the business by dictating processes, architecture and just about everything else. The new director comes in redefines the requirements of the business and then puts it out to a host of suppliers including the in house function. The change may be painful and the incumbent will kick and scream but ultimately the choice is FIFO. The same process should be regularly applied to the EU
Oh sorry, forgot that you voted to flush the UK economy down the toilet.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostBut in 2+ years time they will be having to cough up a further £350M per week!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostThere exists the possibility that a completely revamped EU could emerge. As you point out, there will be many that will oppose any change, but they are all the ones that benefit the most and have least influence and bargaining power. The big players that are financially underpinning this sinking ship are likely to become restless as they find themselves shouldering more of the burden for the needy newcomers and basket-case mediterranean economies. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that the whole project falls apart and the vacuum gets filled by a more sensible and less bureaucratic replacement run along some of the same lines. It may get messy but nothing truly worth having was ever gained easily.
I am up for the challenge anyway, and interesting times lie ahead.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CretinWatcher View PostYou certainly are an optimist
The problem is that Germany, which we all agree is the primary mover and shaker here, does rather well out of the EU and, so far, can afford the financial costs with ease.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostThere exists the possibility that a completely revamped EU could emerge. As you point out, there will be many that will oppose any change, but they are all the ones that benefit the most and have least influence and bargaining power. The big players that are financially underpinning this sinking ship are likely to become restless as they find themselves shouldering more of the burden for the needy newcomers and basket-case mediterranean economies. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that the whole project falls apart and the vacuum gets filled by a more sensible and less bureaucratic replacement run along some of the same lines. It may get messy but nothing truly worth having was ever gained easily.
I am up for the challenge anyway, and interesting times lie ahead.
The problem is that Germany, which we all agree is the primary mover and shaker here, does rather well out of the EU and, so far, can afford the financial costs with ease.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CretinWatcher View PostAFAIK he's a Brit living in Germany that takes every opportunity he can to criticise the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CretinWatcher View PostAgree to a degree.
But I don't think they'll budge on Single Market (i.e. no tariffs)=Free Movement. That is one of the 4 pillars of the EU.
Why would they allow the benefits without the costs?
Everyone will want to exit, then.
The German manufacturers lobby will be on our side, a swathe of Eastern European countries with nothing to lose and a veto will be against us.
And contrary to popular opinion we have most to lose - our lifeblood, financial services.
I am up for the challenge anyway, and interesting times lie ahead.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
Tariffs are in nobody's best interests where both sides have much to offer the other.
But I don't think they'll budge on Single Market (i.e. no tariffs)=Free Movement. That is one of the 4 pillars of the EU.
Why would they allow the benefits without the costs?
Everyone will want to exit, then.
The German manufacturers lobby will be on our side, a swathe of Eastern European countries with nothing to lose and a veto will be against us.
And contrary to popular opinion we have most to lose - our lifeblood, financial services.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CretinWatcher View PostYou haven't provided a link but I'll take your data as accurate.
Point still stands, though, wherever in Europe British built cars are sold, they are mostly on the price sensitive end of the market, and with tariffs will not be competitive with the domestic competition.
Tariffs are in nobody's best interests where both sides have much to offer the other. That is why they will not be implemented to any meaningful degree if at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostIn Q1 of this Year there were 516,392 cars sold in France of which Nissan managed 20,285 and Honda off the bottom of the chart at less than 4,000.
I don't regard less than 5% of the market as being "a lot". Do you?
Point still stands, though, wherever in Europe British built cars are sold, they are mostly on the price sensitive end of the market, and with tariffs will not be competitive with the domestic competition.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: