Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Deboomed....
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Deboomed...."
Collapse
-
Most contracts have multiple termination clauses. It depends on which termination clause was triggered in to whether you get paid compensation.Originally posted by missinggreenfields View PostSo, did the OP negotiate a contract clause which gave them the right to receive compensation payment in case of early termination, or did they just get some kind of mutuality of obligation?
Leave a comment:
-
So, did the OP negotiate a contract clause which gave them the right to receive compensation payment in case of early termination, or did they just get some kind of mutuality of obligation?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNo it isn't.
Suppliers can negotiate contracts where they receive a compensation payment if the contract is terminated early and there was no issue with the service.
On the other hand clients can also demand compensation if something fundamental to the service changes e.g. if the personnel providing the service changes. This is why enacting your right to substitution can actually be painful if the client fully agrees it can happen as they can penalise the supplier through payment and hand over conditions.
Because there's a huge difference and without knowing what is in the contract, it's potentially dangerous advice to so boldly tell everyone that getting paid to do no work isn't an IR35 indicator.
Leave a comment:
-
On that length of contract, why worry?Originally posted by pmeswani View PostThe good thing is that I am getting my weeks notice paid. However, I am not sure if that is an IR35 indicator.
Worst case, put it in your pension.
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds very odd that they terminated your contract when you walked on site. Was that the first time they saw you, i.e. they just didn't like the 'look' of you or something?
Leave a comment:
-
Bugger. Sorry to hear that
But sod 'em, something better'll turn up
Leave a comment:
-
Not a big concern if you were only there a few days, anyway.Originally posted by pmeswani View PostThat's good to know.
Leave a comment:
-
That's good to know.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNo it isn't.
Suppliers can negotiate contracts where they receive a compensation payment if the contract is terminated early and there was no issue with the service.
On the other hand clients can also demand compensation if something fundamental to the service changes e.g. if the personnel providing the service changes. This is why enacting your right to substitution can actually be painful if the client fully agrees it can happen as they can penalise the supplier through payment and hand over conditions.
Leave a comment:
-
No it isn't.Originally posted by pmeswani View PostThe good thing is that I am getting my weeks notice paid. However, I am not sure if that is an IR35 indicator.
Suppliers can negotiate contracts where they receive a compensation payment if the contract is terminated early and there was no issue with the service.
On the other hand clients can also demand compensation if something fundamental to the service changes e.g. if the personnel providing the service changes. This is why enacting your right to substitution can actually be painful if the client fully agrees it can happen as they can penalise the supplier through payment and hand over conditions.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30


Leave a comment: