Reply to: Has the USA gone mad?

[WTFH]

So Trump refused to debate with Bernie, or as one wag but it... "Chickens don't like to be near people called Saunders"

[LondonManc]

They are as bad as each other but least we know one can do the job. Also if you want to be POTUS it's a good idea not to call some rulers of foreign nations terrorists because of their religious beliefs.

Or talking about corrupt nations like our lot?

[LondonManc]

I think that's accurate except with Trump sympathisers. Certainly the popular (of course that's the same as ignorant) view. When the people denouncing her are supporting someone like Trump, that's more of an endorsement.

Love it - the good old patronising only an idiot would disagree approach. Again. That's all you've got. No defence of Hilary, just straight on the attack. Still waiting for a reply to my comments on "The Shredder", but I guess I'll be waiting a while.

[VectraMan]

I think that's accurate except with Trump sympathisers. Certainly the popular (of course that's the same as ignorant) view. When the people denouncing her are supporting someone like Trump, that's more of an endorsement.

This guy really likes Hilary:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5A02pNcGHs

[Bee]

When does Merkel get kicked out?

Mind you she put up with that Italian fool.

Yes, but Merkel is a saint compared with Trump.

[SueEllen]

Since the beginning I have a strong feeling that Trump will win.

I hope the allies has strength to go against his stupid ideas.

When does Merkel get kicked out?

Mind you she put up with that Italian fool.

[Bee]

FFS, Donald Trump?

At least the world will end quickly.

Since the beginning I have a strong feeling that Trump will win.

I hope the allies has strength to go against his stupid ideas.

[d000hg]

I'm a bit confused by the Hilary-hatred. I always had the impression that she was good and well respected, if perhaps seen as a bit of a wishy washy liberal. Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention.

I think that's accurate except with Trump sympathisers. Certainly the popular (of course that's the same as ignorant) view. When the people denouncing her are supporting someone like Trump, that's more of an endorsement.

[VectraMan]

I'm a bit confused by the Hilary-hatred. I always had the impression that she was good and well respected, if perhaps seen as a bit of a wishy washy liberal. Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention.

When it costs near enough $1bn just to be a candidate to be the party nominee no honest person can possibly run for The White House, so everyone's in the pocket of someone. I suppose you can say that Trump is at least in his own pocket.

[OwlHoot]

Also if you want to be POTUS it's a good idea not to call some rulers of foreign nations terrorists because of their religious beliefs.

If as PM you want to be on good terms with the probable next POTUS, it's a Bad Idea to call him "divisive, stupid, and wrong"

[SueEllen]

Ah, Hillary. How's the FBI investigation into her mishandling of classified information?
She's a war-monger to boot. Don't you remember her "We came, we saw, he died!" exclamation about Gaddafi, taken down as he considered selling oil in a currency other than the mighty dollar? To compound the misery, they stepped back afterwards and let Libya disintegrate.

She's not even a leftie; she's in bed with big banks and big pharma. Trump's a protectionist and patriot; while his ideas may be odd at times and to the Corbynites repulsive, they are aimed at arresting America's slide that Obama seems to be letting go unchecked; something that Clinton has signed up to continue. But, yeah, Trump is somehow worse.

They are as bad as each other but least we know one can do the job. Also if you want to be POTUS it's a good idea not to call some rulers of foreign nations terrorists because of their religious beliefs.

[LondonManc]

Um, no that's how people make decisions. What on earth other argument would any rational person make?

Trump is worse than Clinton because he's a spiteful, egotistical bigot who inspires hatred.

Ah, Hillary. How's the FBI investigation into her mishandling of classified information?
She's a war-monger to boot. Don't you remember her "We came, we saw, he died!" exclamation about Gaddafi, taken down as he considered selling oil in a currency other than the mighty dollar? To compound the misery, they stepped back afterwards and let Libya disintegrate.

She's not even a leftie; she's in bed with big banks and big pharma. Trump's a protectionist and patriot; while his ideas may be odd at times and to the Corbynites repulsive, they are aimed at arresting America's slide that Obama seems to be letting go unchecked; something that Clinton has signed up to continue. But, yeah, Trump is somehow worse.

[d000hg]

And only an idiot uses the argument that Trump is worse than Clinton because they disagree with what Trump stands for.

Um, no that's how people make decisions. What on earth other argument would any rational person make?

Trump is worse than Clinton because he's a spiteful, egotistical bigot who inspires hatred.

[LondonManc]

Except only an idiot would want to prove to Trumpmerica.

And only an idiot uses the argument that Trump is worse than Clinton because they disagree with what Trump stands for. Yet another well-constructed argument from camp d000hg, up there with free arts courses when we're short of science teachers.

[d000hg]

Except only an idiot would want to prove to Trumpmerica.