• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is Trump right on abortion?"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    If 1 man gets 3 women pregnant, its a goodnight out
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Or "scouser"


    Oh Scouser. I thought you said scourer.....

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Last time I checked, it takes 2 to tango. Punishing 1/2 the people involved because of their gender is discrimination.


    If 1 man gets 3 women pregnant, the 3 women get punished, but the man is not reprimanded and may continue impregnating without fear of retribution.
    Then again, it fits with the gun lobby claim that it's not the gun that's the problem, but the victim who is at fault for being somewhere without a gun.


    Women, because you don't have todgers, you are 100% responsible for all sexual actions and their results.


    (notice how I managed to make these comments without discussing abortion, all I'm talking about is responsibility)
    It's not illegal to get someone pregnant.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    Trump's mother should be executed for not aborting Donald
    The Trump phenomenon is, I think, the last hope to save America.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I'm not sure how one can have an abortion if one is not pregnant, perhaps you've never considered that as relevant either.
    That's like saying a car salesman is partially responsible when a car sold is used in a robbery.

    The vast majority of abortions would be in relation to single women who have the choice to get pregnant or not.
    If I bang some random chick and knock her up, then I'm the babies father.
    But if she chooses be rid of the baby then thats nothing to do with me.

    She chose to get pregnant and she chose to be rid of it. In 2016 it really is a simple choice.

    If it's a guy pressuring a woman to do it, then that's different. But that's also not what I think Trump is aiming at.



    That aside, what I find weird is that everyone is 'fine' with (what I imagine to be the horror of) forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want. But go nuts when you suggest punishing her for aborting it.

    Of the two I'd imagine the former to be the worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    No one knows how bad or stupid their off-spring are going to turn out.
    That's why the monarchy has carried on for so long.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    Trump's mother should be executed for not aborting Donald
    No one knows how bad or stupid their off-spring are going to turn out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Trump's mother should be executed for not aborting Donald

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Admit it - you immediately thought the same thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Shame his mother didn't have one...

    (Sorry can't help it.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    but they won't want this religious crap.
    Here I disagree completely. The Yanks DO want this religious crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    The fun thing is watching how many people on CUK share what appear to be his views one day, then also share what appear to be his views the next day, even though those views seem to have changed drastically in the space of 24 hours, and were in both cases completely contradictory of other views he claims to have held on many matters.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • ZARDOZ
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    On the plus side I suppose, if he gets in, he may not be as bad as many think.
    Probably less war happy than Clinton and Cruz.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    But still not as insulting as "Donald Trump".
    Or "scouser"

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post


    One of my favourite ever tweets
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    PuffinWank is now demoted!
    But still not as insulting as "Donald Trump".

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X