Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Is Trump right on abortion?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is Trump right on abortion?"
Collapse
-
It's not illegal to get someone pregnant.Originally posted by WTFH View PostLast time I checked, it takes 2 to tango. Punishing 1/2 the people involved because of their gender is discrimination.
If 1 man gets 3 women pregnant, the 3 women get punished, but the man is not reprimanded and may continue impregnating without fear of retribution.
Then again, it fits with the gun lobby claim that it's not the gun that's the problem, but the victim who is at fault for being somewhere without a gun.
Women, because you don't have todgers, you are 100% responsible for all sexual actions and their results.
(notice how I managed to make these comments without discussing abortion, all I'm talking about is responsibility)
Leave a comment:
-
The Trump phenomenon is, I think, the last hope to save America.Originally posted by Unix View PostTrump's mother should be executed for not aborting Donald
Leave a comment:
-
That's like saying a car salesman is partially responsible when a car sold is used in a robbery.Originally posted by WTFH View PostI'm not sure how one can have an abortion if one is not pregnant, perhaps you've never considered that as relevant either.
The vast majority of abortions would be in relation to single women who have the choice to get pregnant or not.
If I bang some random chick and knock her up, then I'm the babies father.
But if she chooses be rid of the baby then thats nothing to do with me.
She chose to get pregnant and she chose to be rid of it. In 2016 it really is a simple choice.
If it's a guy pressuring a woman to do it, then that's different. But that's also not what I think Trump is aiming at.
That aside, what I find weird is that everyone is 'fine' with (what I imagine to be the horror of) forcing a woman to give birth to a child she doesn't want. But go nuts when you suggest punishing her for aborting it.
Of the two I'd imagine the former to be the worse.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
FTFYOriginally posted by d000hg View PostThe fun thing is watching how many people on CUK share what appear to be his views one day, then also share what appear to be his views the next day, even though those views seem to have changed drastically in the space of 24 hours, and were in both cases completely contradictory of other views he claims to have held on many matters.
Leave a comment:
-
Or "scouser"Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostBut still not as insulting as "Donald Trump".
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Today 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Yesterday 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47




Leave a comment: