Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Enterprise car is speed limited
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Enterprise car is speed limited"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NigelJK View PostAh yes the 'course'. The point of which is that you were not 'done' and your generous donation to the Council/ACPO xmas ball was gratefully received.
I've not seen anyone get points for 34 in a 30 yet.
You were unlucky on the 81 charge, most Traffic would tend to ignore that unless you were being a nob.
They were all camera vans I assume not the the big yellow ones (GATSO's?) and I never saw any of them!
Prior to that I got the dreaded double flash near Jnct 44 M6 - roadworks, 40 limit instead of the usual 50 back then, nothing every happened, guess there was no film in it, and same on Sheffield Parkway, I had to accelerate to avoid someone who'd pulled right in front of me, got a letter in post saying I was doing 48 in a 40 but no further action, reckon they hadn't got a clear pic cos I'd gone round the other car...
Two bus lane penalties and that's the sum total of my driving transgressions!
Leave a comment:
-
Ah yes the 'course'. The point of which is that you were not 'done' and your generous donation to the Council/ACPO xmas ball was gratefully received.
I've not seen anyone get points for 34 in a 30 yet.
You were unlucky on the 81 charge, most Traffic would tend to ignore that unless you were being a nob.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NigelJK View PostAlthough it is at the discretion, you do realise that it's their own (privately owned) association?
If you'd like to post the poof of that on Pepipoo I'd appreciate it. It's done the rounds several times and no one has yet posted proof, despite plenty of plod bashing going on.
Leave a comment:
-
Explains why I got done for 34 in a 30 - twice....
If you'd like to post the poof of that on Pepipoo I'd appreciate it. It's done the rounds several times and no one has yet posted proof, despite plenty of plod bashing going on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stek View PostAt my SAC the woman said the 2mph is at the discretion of the Chief Constable and they've been told not to exercise it said discretion.
Explains why I got done for 34 in a 30 - twice....
In a built up area you are more likely to hit a vulnerable road user than on a motorway.
Hence I've never been done doing 78 on a motorway and have been alongside police and had radar guns pointed at me. However I know to be careful on dual carriageways that are national speed limit....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NigelJK View PostAnd ACPO guidelines are limit + 10% + 2mph so in a 70 it's 77mph before plod get interested.
Explains why I got done for 34 in a 30 - twice....
Leave a comment:
-
And ACPO guidelines are limit + 10% + 2mph so in a 70 it's 77mph before plod get interested.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostWhat tune?
And for the less technical:
Higher pressure = more likely a bigger radius, bigger radius = longer distance per revolution. Car speed is measured by revolutions.
As for the oft-misquoted 10%, the actual law is:
A speedo must never show less than the actual speed, and must never show more than 110% of actual speed + 6.25mph.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostLimited to 70? That's dangerous. It could block you in the middle of an overtake or emergency manoeuvre. You might have to do marginallly more than 70 when overtaking on the motorway, to be safe. Plod wouldn't pull you for that.
Leave a comment:
-
Limited to 70? That's dangerous. It could block you in the middle of an overtake or emergency manoeuvre. You might have to do marginallly more than 70 when overtaking on the motorway, to be safe. Plod wouldn't pull you for that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DallasDad View PostNot quite a Ferrari but this should meet you specification and get the OP to his destination a bit faster
The car belongs to Dreadnought garage in Scotland and has a Kenne Bell blower under the bonnet.
They used it as a development platform for MGR before they went tits up in 2005
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFNkrwRmba8
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: