Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Government to ban procurement boycotts on Ethical or Moral grounds."
So? The issue of boycotting products wasn't part of any manifesto - I voted for my councillor to best serve my interests and those of the community, not to be a part of a regime as corrupt as the one that they would be expressing mock offence at. That said, we've got a Labour council so we're screwed anyway. More obsessed with flower beds looking nice than roads not having potholes.
Councils are elected by local constituents and I'd say those elections are more democratic than General Election where people vote for the party, or more like for party leader.
So? The issue of boycotting products wasn't part of any manifesto - I voted for my councillor to best serve my interests and those of the community, not to be a part of a regime as corrupt as the one that they would be expressing mock offence at. That said, we've got a Labour council so we're screwed anyway. More obsessed with flower beds looking nice than roads not having potholes.
I disagree. Why should councils get to decide what's in their own personal best interests rather than those of their constituents?
Councils are elected by local constituents and I'd say those elections are more democratic than General Election where people vote for the party, or more like for party leader.
No, that's not true - Unis don't put any restrictions on jews wishing to study in Unis (that would be race discrimination which would be illegal in UK), what they do is limiting foreign contacts with Unis in Israel on moral/ethical grounds - they don't do it because there are jews there, they do it because of their view of Israeli policies, specifically related to expanding settlements.
Govt should STFU on this one and many other things too.
I disagree. Why should councils get to decide what's in their own personal best interests rather than those of their constituents?
The equivalent would be tube drivers not allowing Jews on. HTH.
No, that's not true - Unis don't put any restrictions on jews wishing to study in Unis (that would be race discrimination which would be illegal in UK), what they do is limiting foreign contacts with Unis in Israel on moral/ethical grounds - they don't do it because there are jews there, they do it because of their view of Israeli policies, specifically related to expanding settlements.
Govt should STFU on this one and many other things too.
Fine. But this isn't about individuals. It's about the leaders of publicly funded organisations forcing their political ideals boycotts on the people using or working with/for those organisations. I suppose councils are voted in, so at least in theory they represent the general public.
Unions can call Tube strikes in London, I'd say it's far more relevant to UK than some unis deciding to boycott Israel on moral/ethical grounds.
Unis historically being doings things like this - being anti Vietnam war and such, pretty pathetic to see UK Govt being concerned about tiny boycott.
..., if some individuals want to impose their own, especially on moral grounds then they are entitled to it - nobody is forced to follow them.
Fine. But this isn't about individuals. It's about the leaders of publicly funded organisations forcing their political ideals boycotts on the people using or working with/for those organisations. I suppose councils are voted in, so at least in theory they represent the general public.
Quite right, they have been elected to deal with issues like this. Local government has been elected to deal with local issues. Did any of your councillors state their views on boycotting Israel when canvassing for votes?
No cos I hid from them.
I thought they were the local Jehovah's Witnesses....
The government is saying that boycotts and sanctions will be decided at government level only
Quite right, they have been elected to deal with issues like this. Local government has been elected to deal with local issues. Did any of your councillors state their views on boycotting Israel when canvassing for votes?
Leave a comment: