• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Dispatches: Taxing The Rich"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Why aren't the young angry?
    Too busy taking selfies, updating their FB status, watching Big Brother and TOWIE.

    Leave a comment:


  • eman
    replied
    Because we don't know...don't understand, or simply don't care - which is symptomatic of a whole other set of issues....

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Private Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.
    What I noticed is that their company was loss making and now made tiny profit (£720k), yet highest paid director (allegedly Sir Peter) got paid £684k!

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    £400k in in dividends,
    Private Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.

    Full story with discussion

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Why aren't the young angry?

    http://www.theguardian.com/business/...e_iOSApp_Other

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    True, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economy
    I reckon taxes would be lower under this tough but fair regime - the penalties for non-payment however will be appropriate...

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    His family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.

    Something isn't right here...
    True, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economy

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Not surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
    His family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.

    Something isn't right here...

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Not surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "Osborne received a dividend worth £1,200, paid in 2014"

    That's not even worth talking about.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti..._campaign=1490

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Touché, although there are ways around keeping assets, as anyone who was in Ireland during the banking crisis knows....
    Still happening in Greece.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    She thought you called me a douche
    not sure anyone would want you cleaning their feminine areas.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Yes, I understand that.

    Touché: (in fencing) used as an acknowledgement of a hit by one's opponent.

    What did you think it meant?
    She thought you called me a douche

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Dispatches: Taxing The Rich

    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    He's not being touche he's pointing out the contractors, footballers and others who have been caught out.
    Yes, I understand that.

    Touché: (in fencing) used as an acknowledgement of a hit by one's opponent.

    What did you think it meant?
    Last edited by meridian; 14 February 2016, 00:53.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X