Originally posted by meridian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dispatches: Taxing The Rich
Collapse
X
-
-
-
"Osborne received a dividend worth £1,200, paid in 2014"Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
That's not even worth talking about.Comment
-
Not surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
His family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostNot surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Something isn't right here...Comment
-
True, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyOriginally posted by AtW View PostHis family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.
Something isn't right here...Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
I reckon taxes would be lower under this tough but fair regime - the penalties for non-payment however will be appropriate...Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostTrue, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyComment
-
Comment
-
Private Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.£400k in in dividends,
Full story with discussionComment
-
What I noticed is that their company was loss making and now made tiny profit (£720k), yet highest paid director (allegedly Sir Peter) got paid £684k!Originally posted by NigelJK View PostPrivate Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Today 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Yesterday 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Yesterday 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13

Comment