Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Sounds ok but can one trust the EU not to impose things on us via some legal back door?
If there's a legal back door the issue is not whether or not we trust the EU to not use it, but that's there's a legal back door that needs to be closed.
Yes, restricting cross-border cooperation between police forces is definitely a win!
Sounds not a good idea but this opt-in involves 22 EU justice and home affairs laws - some may not be so useful. Without knowing the full details (had a quick look but can't be arsed to spend time on it), hard to comment. Although it does seem that the UK opt in allows us to "accept or reject legislation on a case-by-case basis"
Denmark voted against further integration on Thursday in a referendum that boasted a turnout of 72%. As WSJ reports, “voters were asked if parliament should have the power to opt-in on a total of 22 EU justice and home affairs laws, from which the small Nordic country has hitherto been exempt.”
Leave a comment: