• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Are you supporting Air strikes against "IS" in Syria ?"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    I'm all for it, my shares in weapons manufacturers are going to skyrocket
    Plan B going according to plan



    Another one to invest in as well:

    “Chemring is well-positioned to benefit from any sustained increase in demand as a result of the conflict in the Middle East. Furthermore, although there has been a slowdown in the West’s military spending, it is important not to forget that in both Asia and the Middle East there are signs that military spending is on the increase and Chemring will be looking to take advantage of this trend wherever possible.”

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Isn't this something that is a)quite important to find out b)not that difficult? I have no concept of what an oil field looks like but you'd think with the surveillance and intelligence forces around the globe, this should be an achievable priority without having to blow up the oilfield.
    Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Eyes Measures to Close Turkish-Syrian Border; Says Closure Will Curb Terrorists in Syria; Notes Hollande Told Obama Border Question Is Key to Stopping Flow of Militants and Jihadi Financing; Jarablus Corridor Now at Ce

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Putin is a liar.
    And a plagiarist.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Quite surprised no-one's posted this yet:



    tulip, isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Putin is a liar.
    And a plagiarist.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Turkey according to Putin.

    Vladimir Putin: Turkey's Leaders Are 'Stuffing Pockets' With ISIS Oil Cash - NBC News

    He may not be wrong.

    PS Or more exactly Erdogan and his family. That b* is taking Turkey backwards.
    Putin is a liar.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I hadn't considered this before but it begs the question who are they selling the oil too? Why is anyone buying it from them?
    Assad buys it. He has got lots of Soviet tanks/APCs - all consume a lot of fuel and he got nowhere else to get it from.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Isn't this something that is a)quite important to find out b)not that difficult? I have no concept of what an oil field looks like but you'd think with the surveillance and intelligence forces around the globe, this should be an achievable priority without having to blow up the oilfield.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    who are they selling the oil too?
    Turkey according to Putin.

    Vladimir Putin: Turkey's Leaders Are 'Stuffing Pockets' With ISIS Oil Cash - NBC News

    He may not be wrong.

    PS Or more exactly Erdogan and his family. That b* is taking Turkey backwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    On a serious note the strikes on IS-controlled airfields are discussed as trying to cut off IS revenue sources. I hadn't considered this before but it begs the question who are they selling the oil too? Why is anyone buying it from them?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    "Military intervention" is a pretty wide ranging thing. Who you're targeting, how you do it, what your motivations are and your prior relationships and history all play a huge part as your linked article claims.

    But more generally, taking a soundbite out of a speech can very easily be twisted and I fear that's the nor these days. Don't bother to see what the context was or anything, just scour the transcript for a phrase which you can parrot.

    As a trite example if I say "It's not true that I hate gay people" you could quote that as:

    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    ...I hate gay people

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Lose-lose situation. Condemned whether you conform and bomb and as a result radicalize onlooking susceptible muzzers from the rest of the world or stand back and let IS increase in power/consolidate their caliphate.

    The simple option seems to be boots on the ground - remove their territory and there is no caliphate and no concept of an IS. Is it really that simple though? I doubt it. With IS gone, you're then back to Russian-backed Assad vs any Syrian that's not with Assad.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Hurrah, the FaceBook "share before you think" memes are reaching CUK now.

    Here's another one, even more vacuous:
    Sorry for pointing out what Cameron said: Cameron says Russian military action in Syria a 'terrible mistake' | Reuters

    British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Sunday that Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin's decision to take military action in Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was a "terrible mistake".
    ...
    "It's going to make the region more unstable, it will lead to further radicalisation and increased terrorism. I would say to them 'change direction, join us in attacking ISIL'."

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Hmmm...

    Hurrah, the FaceBook "share before you think" memes are reaching CUK now.

    Here's another one, even more vacuous:

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by Gumbo Robot View Post
    Who was it who once said that war is the show business end of politics?

    They've been chomping at the bit since they lost the vote in 2013.

    Except back then the enemy was Eurasia, and now it's Eastasia.

    Correction. The enemy in 2013 was Eastasia. The enemy has always been Eastasia. Eurasia has always been our ally
    That is so on the money it is unreal!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X