Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "3.5% tax - how do people think they get away with it?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostIf I read this correctly, I think you're calling PC a brainfart.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostIf I read this correctly, I think you're calling PC a brainfart.
As I've said on the various BN66 threads over the years, I strongly oppose the tax strategy they used, I don't support it in any way and I feel the scheme users were at best naive to expect to get away with it free and clear, that being said when HMG uses retrospection to close a loophole in a poorly worded bit of legislation then they've gone too far.
Natural justice would dictate that HMG's actions using retrospective actions were unreasonable, unfortunately the courts disagree. As Brillo said at the time that people were using the scheme there was a loophole that it exploited, just as tax loopholes have always been exploited and are still being exploited today.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostTempting!
But no. Moving brainfarts out of the professional forums takes precedence.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostTempting!
But no. Moving brainfarts out of the professional forums takes precedence.
You sadistic-pleasure-monger
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThough it might be funny if NAT/cojak move the thread back to A+L then give me an infraction!
But no. Moving brainfarts out of the professional forums takes precedence.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostI see that the BN66 crew are on the job making it look like they are legally allowed to pay only 3.5% tax on 100K earnings. It was HMRC approved as well and it was exclusive scheme only available to a select few hand picked to avoid tax legally.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostPity the mods on this forum act like 6 year olds mind.
Leave a comment:
-
I see that the BN66 crew are on the job making it look like they are legally allowed to pay only 3.5% tax on 100K earnings. It was HMRC approved as well and it was exclusive scheme only available to a select few hand picked to avoid tax legally.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTo the OP
Thank God I can use that now!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: