Originally posted by Kitten1978
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: New mortgage
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New mortgage"
Collapse
-
So, Kitten1978, do you put the chutney spoon back once you have licked it?
In regards to your other questions - yes, natural to feel nervous taking on more expense but with all that cash sloshing around in the system wages/rates could well keep pushing up and as long as you keep with current skills and make good connections as your rate should move up too. Yes, we are going to be hit with dividend tax and possibly shafted over expenses too so you definitely need to take that into account when budgeting for the future. What market are you in and what is contract availability like at present?
Urrrgh no I wash it up, what do you think I am!?! :-) Haha
I am in BI, SQL Server, (SSAS, MDX, SSRS, SSIS) and the market *touch wood* is looking good at the moment.
I am intending on over paying the mortgage.
That dividend tax is a nightmare, I signed a petition about it, don't know if it will do much good but still...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostErm, no. You're in business, aren't you? Interest on a loan is only deductible to the extent that the loan is used for business purposes, so any loan on a BTL to fund a private residence will not be for business purposes and therefore not deductible.
It doesn't matter that the collateral (your BTL) is a business rental, it's the purpose that you use the loan money for.
As for intent of capital allocation, there are ways and means. OP could even buy her resi home and then release equity to fund a BTL, which would make part of the interest on her home mortgage a tax deductible expense. Centurian's post above does well to highlight the possibilities available in using equity.
How many properties are you managing in your own investment portfolio?
Leave a comment:
-
You may have found the endless dribble of the fake ID's from the South West desirable, but a lot of the regulars certainly didn't/don't as it's still going on, you've also confirmed that the "no sockpuppet trolling rule" is and was a complete sham by policy.
It also gives the lie to the assertions that they aren't permitted as a way to keep the site traffic up.
As I have said before the sockpuppets with some wit and comedy value are vastly different such as that parrot that stalks Zeity, the erstwhile Captain that annoys Zeity (pattern emerging here?), the Daleks, Spartacus and I'm sure there are loads more, they are deployed only as foils for a joke though.
Chalk and cheese compared to the Kandr re-incarnations, Wilmslow, Gricer, Gittins, endless Aussielongs etc, etc which are just trolls.
The long term trolling by sockpuppets has created exactly the environment which you're expressing concern about, genuine posters being treated as yet another in the endless stream of troll ID's due to the signal to noise ratio, to term it an own goal is a gross understatement.
The trolling ID's don't generate any fun, they're just witless with no entertainment value at all.
I can't believe that you're not aware of the spike in formulaic sockie posts in the professional sections (for postcount to allow free posting) from new and "sleeper" ID's created a few years back every time that a few of the sockies are finally killed off, the pattern has been repeated on many occasions. That pattern also includes the trolls being flagged, often defended by yourself, NAT and Cojak and then eventually, reluctantly killed.
As to reporting them for action, unless there's been a dramatic and genuine change of policy rather than the current and past sham then it achieves exactly nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostHmm, I dunno Admin, whether you are being serious or hopeful. But what I have found is that the sockie strategy of creating a girlie sounding username and a girlie avatar makes most of the mods in here melt. Plenty of examples where a sockie was identified successfully but mods chose to let the charade continue perhaps to liven up the forum a bit.
The problem we have is that real accounts are being hounded on signup as being sockies and it has happened more than once now, where a real new user has been accused of being a fake account. If we want the forum to be more fun without the proliferation of sockie accounts then let us take care of the sockies and if you report them to us we will deal with them.
I am serious and hopeful
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by centurian View PostWhich is only the case if you tell them - people have been doing that for years. Landlords have been buying their own primary residences and/or funding improvements to their primary residence by extending their BTL mortgages and releasing capital for yonks.
Get tax relief when releasing equity on a buy-to-let property
It's a basic business finance principle. Businesses can refinance to release capital back to shareholders and the refinancing costs are tax deductible in the future. Yes, there are some flimsy rules to prevent it for BTL, but HMRC often can't be arsed to pursue it because it's so hard to prove.
It's another reason why the BTL interest changes came in the recent budget - to reduce the incentive for it.
Danger Will Robinson, severe risk of drifting close to being on thread topic!Last edited by TykeMerc; 11 October 2015, 10:29.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostErm, no. You're in business, aren't you? Interest on a loan is only deductible to the extent that the loan is used for business purposes, so any loan on a BTL to fund a private residence will not be for business purposes and therefore not deductible.
It doesn't matter that the collateral (your BTL) is a business rental, it's the purpose that you use the loan money for.
Get tax relief when releasing equity on a buy-to-let property
It's a basic business finance principle. Businesses can refinance to release capital back to shareholders and the refinancing costs are tax deductible in the future. Yes, there are some flimsy rules to prevent it for BTL, but HMRC often can't be arsed to pursue it because it's so hard to prove.
It's another reason why the BTL interest changes came in the recent budget - to reduce the incentive for it.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostTried the reporting thing in the past, gained zero traction despite them ending up banned after multiple months and hundreds more posts.
As long as posting is of some value (fun, useful or just makes you feel better about your own miserable life) then it's ok. Sockie or not - admin will sort 'em out without your help.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by administrator View PostSockie hunters - if you think a post is from a fake account then use the report post system and let us sort it out. I have lost count of the number of times you have called sockie only for it to be a real person and it is getting a little tiresome. We are able to check things out that help to give a better idea if a poster is genuine or not so let's give this sockie thing a rest and let us work out what is a fake account and what isn't - you can help us by simply reporting the post if you think it isn't genuine. Maybe we should introduce infractions for people calling out sockies rather than reporting them...
Hmm, I dunno Admin, whether you are being serious or hopeful. But what I have found is that the sockie strategy of creating a girlie sounding username and a girlie avatar makes most of the mods in here melt. Plenty of examples where a sockie was identified successfully but mods chose to let the charade continue perhaps to liven up the forum a bit.
Leave a comment:
-
New mortgage
Originally posted by ChimpMaster View PostAs for the current house that will become your BTL, you would have wanted to maximise the loan on that property to fund your new residential home. This is because the loan interest on the BTL will be tax deductible, but you also need to be aware of the recent budget changes proposed by the Chancellor.
It doesn't matter that the collateral (your BTL) is a business rental, it's the purpose that you use the loan money for.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChimpMaster View PostYes.
Yes.
But only you know how secure your income is likely to be in the medium/long term and you have to weigh this up against what is effectively a long term debt. Perhaps your partner also contributes, in which case you aren't so reliant on a single income.
£1,000 / month is not a lot for a mortgage these days, and depending on your personal circumstances you might want to overpay as much as possible - though hopefully you will have secured a very low interest rate and so might even consider investing surplus income elsewhere.
As for the current house that will become your BTL, you would have wanted to maximise the loan on that property to fund your new residential home. This is because the loan interest on the BTL will be tax deductible, but you also need to be aware of the recent budget changes proposed by the Chancellor.
Feck me. This is Sensible City. Mods! - we clearly have a troll here! Perma Ban for Chimp Master, please!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostSo post in one of the professional forums, such as Accounting/Legal for non-rude helpful answers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostTried the reporting thing in the past, gained zero traction despite them ending up banned after multiple months and hundreds more posts.
Also seen the Mod response that they aren't sockies (Gittins and the endless stable of related ones are examples, the Scroatman one is still posting) and yet they were/are.
Unix was clearly ID'd as the many times banned Kandr/Russell on many occasions, still posting.
MercladUK was ID'd as a sockie at post 1, took a good 1000 posts, I'm not convinced the track record of sock killing supports your assertions.
On the tiresome front I refer the "honourable Gentleman" to the endless chain of sockpuppet troll postings.....
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: