Gordon Bennet! Not another damn TV rugby match at the village club and pub tomorrow! I shall make sure I get up there after 9.30.
At least with boring tennis you can watch Serena Williams's bottom.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: One for the Rugger Buggers!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "One for the Rugger Buggers!!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
I'll come out of hiding this week having just recovered from a thoroughly enjoyable victory at Villa Park that was a pleasure to behold and has all but condemned the previous week's hara kiri from memory...but not quite.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNo need to worry. I had sussed it out beforehand by consulting my friend WIKI.
I must say this whole Rugby World Cup thingy has really captured the imagination. One slight drawback is the slightly predictable nature of most of the overall results.
Despite plucky and game performances by minnows Japan (v South Africa), and England (v Wales), most outcomes have followed the form books.
Still, all to play for so pip pip!!
PS Just been offered on ebay a slightly buckled chariot wheel. Apparently it fell off someone's vehicle in West London yesterday evening. Any takers? DA?
I'll come out of hiding this week having just recovered from a thoroughly enjoyable victory at Villa Park that was a pleasure to behold and has all but condemned the previous week's hara kiri from memory...but not quite.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zemoxyl View PostThere's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.
I must say this whole Rugby World Cup thingy has really captured the imagination. One slight drawback is the slightly predictable nature of most of the overall results.
Despite plucky and game performances by minnows Japan (v South Africa), and England (v Wales), most outcomes have followed the form books.
Still, all to play for so pip pip!!
PS Just been offered on ebay a slightly buckled chariot wheel. Apparently it fell off someone's vehicle in West London yesterday evening. Any takers? DA?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zemoxyl View PostThe losing team gets a bonus point if they are beaten by 'a converted try' or less. I.e. 7 or fewer points difference.
Score four tries or more and you get a try bonus point win or lose.
However the remnant of the 1950s called the 'Six Nations' does not use this system. Fortunately the World Cup does.
There's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostAs most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
Defies logic................
Can someone explain??
Score four tries or more and you get a try bonus point win or lose.
However the remnant of the 1950s called the 'Six Nations' does not use this system. Fortunately the World Cup does.
There's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt does seem weird. My understanding is the point of this is:
a)Promote teams scoring tries not just kicking it all the damn time
b)Promote the losing team not giving in / force the winning team not to take it easy
If it leads to close, tooth & nail games then great. It'll be curious to see how these rules affect the group standings compared to a more traditional scoring scheme.
Made the England game more interesting too.
Leave a comment:
-
It does seem weird. My understanding is the point of this is:
a)Promote teams scoring tries not just kicking it all the damn time
b)Promote the losing team not giving in / force the winning team not to take it easy
If it leads to close, tooth & nail games then great. It'll be curious to see how these rules affect the group standings compared to a more traditional scoring scheme.
Leave a comment:
-
Researched it myself.
4 points for a win. 2 points for a draw. 1 "bonus" point for scoring 4 tries (or more). 1 "bonus" point for losing by 7 points (or fewer).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostAs most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
Defies logic................
Can someone explain??
Leave a comment:
-
One for the Rugger Buggers!!
As most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
Defies logic................
Can someone explain??
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: