• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "One for the Rugger Buggers!!"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Gordon Bennet! Not another damn TV rugby match at the village club and pub tomorrow! I shall make sure I get up there after 9.30.

    At least with boring tennis you can watch Serena Williams's bottom.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 2 October 2015, 19:52. Reason: Forgot to make bottom bigger

    Leave a comment:


  • zemoxyl
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post


    I'll come out of hiding this week having just recovered from a thoroughly enjoyable victory at Villa Park that was a pleasure to behold and has all but condemned the previous week's hara kiri from memory...but not quite.
    Well have a good game tomorrow : just not as good as us though. Here's hoping for some more great rugby............................

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    No need to worry. I had sussed it out beforehand by consulting my friend WIKI.

    I must say this whole Rugby World Cup thingy has really captured the imagination. One slight drawback is the slightly predictable nature of most of the overall results.
    Despite plucky and game performances by minnows Japan (v South Africa), and England (v Wales), most outcomes have followed the form books.
    Still, all to play for so pip pip!!

    PS Just been offered on ebay a slightly buckled chariot wheel. Apparently it fell off someone's vehicle in West London yesterday evening. Any takers? DA?



    I'll come out of hiding this week having just recovered from a thoroughly enjoyable victory at Villa Park that was a pleasure to behold and has all but condemned the previous week's hara kiri from memory...but not quite.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by zemoxyl View Post
    There's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.
    No need to worry. I had sussed it out beforehand by consulting my friend WIKI.

    I must say this whole Rugby World Cup thingy has really captured the imagination. One slight drawback is the slightly predictable nature of most of the overall results.
    Despite plucky and game performances by minnows Japan (v South Africa), and England (v Wales), most outcomes have followed the form books.
    Still, all to play for so pip pip!!

    PS Just been offered on ebay a slightly buckled chariot wheel. Apparently it fell off someone's vehicle in West London yesterday evening. Any takers? DA?

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by zemoxyl View Post
    The losing team gets a bonus point if they are beaten by 'a converted try' or less. I.e. 7 or fewer points difference.
    Score four tries or more and you get a try bonus point win or lose.

    However the remnant of the 1950s called the 'Six Nations' does not use this system. Fortunately the World Cup does.
    There's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.
    I think the England supporters will be too busy sobbing into their beer to bother watching that one

    Leave a comment:


  • zemoxyl
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    As most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
    By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
    Defies logic................

    Can someone explain??

    The losing team gets a bonus point if they are beaten by 'a converted try' or less. I.e. 7 or fewer points difference.
    Score four tries or more and you get a try bonus point win or lose.

    However the remnant of the 1950s called the 'Six Nations' does not use this system. Fortunately the World Cup does.
    There's a Scotland match this afternoon at 14:30 which may enlighten you.

    Leave a comment:


  • I just need to test it
    replied
    Bump?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It does seem weird. My understanding is the point of this is:

    a)Promote teams scoring tries not just kicking it all the damn time
    b)Promote the losing team not giving in / force the winning team not to take it easy

    If it leads to close, tooth & nail games then great. It'll be curious to see how these rules affect the group standings compared to a more traditional scoring scheme.
    Interesting giving points for exciting play. Good idea in my book.

    Made the England game more interesting too.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It does seem weird. My understanding is the point of this is:

    a)Promote teams scoring tries not just kicking it all the damn time
    b)Promote the losing team not giving in / force the winning team not to take it easy

    If it leads to close, tooth & nail games then great. It'll be curious to see how these rules affect the group standings compared to a more traditional scoring scheme.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Researched it myself.

    4 points for a win. 2 points for a draw. 1 "bonus" point for scoring 4 tries (or more). 1 "bonus" point for losing by 7 points (or fewer).
    Bizarre. Almost as strange as the shape of the ball.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    It is too sophisticated a game for some thick Jocko to understand
    So you don't know then. Fair enough.
    Anyone else?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    As most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
    By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
    Defies logic................

    Can someone explain??

    It is too sophisticated a game for some thick Jocko to understand

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    started a topic One for the Rugger Buggers!!

    One for the Rugger Buggers!!

    As most of the egg-chasing fraternity will be aware, Japan defeated South Africa last saturday by 34-32. I believe that South Africa scored only 4 tries in this defeat.
    By what convoluted extrapolation of logic can the Springboks be eligible to be awarded 2 bonus points for losing when most of the teams that have won their matches by comfortable margins get awarded no more than 1 bonus point?
    Defies logic................

    Can someone explain??

Working...
X