• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sell up and downsize, pensioners told"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

    1. Kill them. <-- Illegal under UK and EU laws.
    2. Build more houses. <-- Illegal under NIMBY/Planning laws.
    3. Property taxes - 100% on second homes. <-- Illegal under EU laws.
    4. Rental income taxed at 100% - no expenses allowed. <-- Illegal under EU laws.
    5. UK property to be owned by UK passport holders. <-- Illegal under EU laws.
    6. Send immigrants home. <-- Illegal under EU laws.
    HTH BIDI

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Not Sarf East London....
    anything round Slough

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin Scroatman
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You never heard of "forced purchase"?
    Ever read Blott on the Landscape?

    That'd be me.

    They can f**k right off....

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin Scroatman View Post
    it's no business of anyone else as it's their property & their property alone.
    You never heard of "forced purchase"?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin Scroatman View Post
    Why though? It belongs to the single elderly person & it's no business of anyone else as it's their property & their property alone.
    I'll be parking a howitzer on the lawn if they ever tried that on me
    I am planning to get one of these, hope neighbors don't mind

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin Scroatman
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    I like the principle of reviewing social housing needs. Say a family home where the kids have flown the nest and it's just a single elderly parent left. Moving them into better suited accommodation (say a 2 bed bungalow or ground floor flat) to free up the property for a new family in need makes sense to me.
    Why though? It belongs to the single elderly person & it's no business of anyone else as it's their property & their property alone.

    I'll be parking a howitzer on the lawn if they ever tried that on me

    Leave a comment:


  • Snarf
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    2015-09-18 It's time to sell up your home OAPs told: Anger as financial watchdog tells elderly to downsize to tackle housing shortage

    Well not exactly "told", yet. But this is how it starts, with honeyed words about encouragement and incentives.

    Been saying for ages that the way things are going, in a few years property rights will go out of the window and the Government will be organising in a massive way exactly where people live.

    If you are single, or a couple cogging on, and living in a nice house you own outright, don't be surprised if you are forced into a pokey high-rise flat to make way for a young family (probably of immigrants)

    Was there anything else in the daily mail today or was that the only article?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    I like the principle of reviewing social housing needs. Say a family home where the kids have flown the nest and it's just a single elderly parent left. Moving them into better suited accommodation (say a 2 bed bungalow or ground floor flat) to free up the property for a new family in need makes sense to me.
    Absolutely, that's fine for social housing where the occupier does not own the property. That's what the spare room subsidy is trying to encourage.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    I like the principle of reviewing social housing needs. Say a family home where the kids have flown the nest and it's just a single elderly parent left. Moving them into better suited accommodation (say a 2 bed bungalow or ground floor flat) to free up the property for a new family in need makes sense to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Sellup and downsize to one of those - Private Islands Magazine

    At least that's what the marketing brochure would be saying, in reality those pensioners would be put on a ship and then sold to slavery

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin Scroatman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why get them to downsize? It will only create blockages elsewhere. Possible solutions :-

    1. Kill them
    2. Build more houses
    3. Property taxes - 100% on second homes
    4. Rental income taxed at 100% - no expenses allowed
    5. UK property to be owned by UK passport holders
    6. Send immigrants home

    Judging by the flotsam and jetsom I see waving British passports around whenever I pass through an airport, I can only assume that they dish them out like smarties so I don't really think this'll have much effect.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    2015-09-18 It's time to sell up your home OAPs told: Anger as financial watchdog tells elderly to downsize to tackle housing shortage

    Well not exactly "told", yet. But this is how it starts, with honeyed words about encouragement and incentives.

    Been saying for ages that the way things are going, in a few years property rights will go out of the window and the Government will be organising in a massive way exactly where people live.

    If you are single, or a couple cogging on, and living in a nice house you own outright, don't be surprised if you are forced into a pokey high-rise flat to make way for a young family (probably of immigrants)

    There is "No such thing as taxpayers

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin Scroatman View Post
    In my own case, I'm going to try and get a restrictive covenant prventing anyone from doing this to my property if I ever decide to sell it.
    Yes, you'd be very successful selling it

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    So therefore my British standards, still fairly multicultural then. If you're taking London/Bradford as your baseline, everywhere looks very white!
    Not Sarf East London....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Why get them to downsize? It will only create blockages elsewhere. Possible solutions :-

    1. Kill them
    2. Build more houses
    3. Property taxes - 100% on second homes
    4. Rental income taxed at 100% - no expenses allowed
    5. UK property to be owned by UK passport holders
    6. Send immigrants home

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X