Reply to: Quick question

[Scruff]

Merely being offensive isn't anywhere near enough - sorry but you're safe. You could ignore me if I upset you so much though, but CUK posters LIKE fighting so you won't

Crusaders, the lot of 'em. IOW failed Gladiators!

[d000hg]

Note to self, must try harder.....

Merely being offensive isn't anywhere near enough - sorry but you're safe. You could ignore me if I upset you so much though, but CUK posters LIKE fighting so you won't

[Unix]

I like dh000gh with his iconoclastic posts.

[MarillionFan]

The mods show favouritism? I thought we were all hated equally....

It's a Neo Christian Zionist Islamic conspiracy it what it is.

[BrilloPad]

I find your humourless accusation of favouritism rather offensive. But then that's you all over, isn't it.

It's a long standing tradition that if you start a thread in General simply to insult another member, you get a ban. The text is also changed to refer to yourself. Feel free to try it.

The mods show favouritism? I thought we were all hated equally....

[NotAllThere]

The psalmtroopers sticking together?

I find your humourless accusation of favouritism rather offensive. But then that's you all over, isn't it.

Flippin' newbies. Fancy not know that it's a long standing tradition that if you start a thread in General simply to insult another member, you get a ban. The text is also changed to refer to yourself. Feel free to try it.

[GlenW]

The psalmtroopers sticking together?

[mudskipper]

No. It's not hypertheically, hyperpathetically or even hypothetically bannable. It's actual.

Btw - fixed it for you.

[NotAllThere]

Is it, hyperthetically speaking, bannable to post a thread, saying for example, that dhimmiPrawn is the thickest, most boring, most irritating airhead, ass, berk blockhead, booby, charlie chump, coot, cretin, dickhead dickwit dimwit dipstick divvy dork dunderhead, dweeb fool, ****wit geek gobtulipe gonzo halfwit, imbecile, jerk lamebrain mooncalf, moron, nerd nincompoop, nitwit numbskull or numskull, numpty oaf, pillock plank plonker prat prick schmuck simpleton, twit wally, I have ever had the misfortune to encounter?

How any poor fooker has to work/live/breath the same air as him, I pity them.

Just asking like.

No. It's not hypertheically, hyperpathetically or even hypothetically bannable. It's actual.

Btw - fixed it for you.

[MarillionFan]

hypothetical, hypothetically

Inconceivable!

[mudskipper]

Don't agree with him on the thread that's annoyed you (Tax isn't theft ??????????????????????????????????????) but d0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000gh is way down my CUK idiot list.

Agree - he's probably about the median.

[tractor]

...

True, if you make him think too much he puts you (or at least claims to put you I have no way of verifying) on his ignore list!!

Note to self, must try harder.....

[NickFitz]

hypothetical, hypothetically

[MyUserName]

I think this is okay, just don't get on to the religion stuff then you'll be really ****ed.

True, if you make him think too much he puts you (or at least claims to put you I have no way of verifying) on his ignore list!!

[GlenW]

Is it, hyperthetically speaking, bannable to post a thread, saying for example, that dhimmiPrawn is the thickest, most irritating airhead, ass, berk blockhead, booby, charlie chump, coot, cretin, dickhead dickwit dimwit dipstick divvy dork dunderhead, dweeb fool, ****wit geek gobtulipe gonzo halfwit, imbecile, jerk lamebrain mooncalf, moron, nerd nincompoop, nitwit numbskull or numskull, numpty oaf, pillock plank plonker prat prick schmuck simpleton, twit wally I have ever had the misfortune to encounter?

How any poor fooker has to work/live/breath the same air as him, I pity them.

Just asking like.

I think this is okay, just don't get on to the religion stuff then you'll be really ****ed.