Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: About contractors & benefits
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "About contractors & benefits"
Collapse
-
Paying inappropriate salary to someone - taking the piss.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostBIG DIFFERENCE
Paying inappropriate salary to someone is not allowed and HMRC will ask you to justify it.
Claiming JSA as a contractor is perfectly legal, above board, allowed. How many times?
Claiming JSA as a contractor - taking the piss.
How many more times?
Leave a comment:
-
BIG DIFFERENCEOriginally posted by tractor View PostWhy would you apply that to your company and not to JSA?
Paying inappropriate salary to someone is not allowed and HMRC will ask you to justify it.
Claiming JSA as a contractor is perfectly legal, above board, allowed. How many times?
Leave a comment:
-
Why would you apply that to your company and not to JSA?Originally posted by psychocandy View PostOK maybe too wide ranging a statement. Its not clever to pay your wife a salary of say £10K when, in effect, she does bugger all or a bit of filing.
My understanding is that any salary needs to be appropriate for the work actually done. i.e. dont take the piss.
Leave a comment:
-
OK maybe too wide ranging a statement. Its not clever to pay your wife a salary of say £10K when, in effect, she does bugger all or a bit of filing.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostAnd the basis for that is what exactly?
My understanding is that any salary needs to be appropriate for the work actually done. i.e. dont take the piss.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostPsycho - do you not have income protection insurance?I thought there was a form of income protection one could take out as a contractor, but it would presumably only cover unexpected lack of income i.e. contract cut short, not benched between contracts.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostYou mean for things like redundancy? No. To be honest its a grey area and I dont think you'd get this past an insurance company. i.e. own company just made myself redundant etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Nope but she is a shareholder and director. And has her own job anyway.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostYou employ your Mrs, don't you? Have you considered laying her off for 6 months each year, and doubling her salary for the other 6 months to maximise the benefits she can claim?
I think you'll find paying your wife a salary is not clever thing to do.
Leave a comment:
-
You're fired, now get your @ss down the dole office, then cook my dinner!Originally posted by mudskipper View PostYou employ your Mrs, don't you? Have you considered laying her off for 6 months each year, and doubling her salary for the other 6 months to maximise the benefits she can claim?
Leave a comment:
-
You employ your Mrs, don't you? Have you considered laying her off for 6 months each year, and doubling her salary for the other 6 months to maximise the benefits she can claim?Originally posted by psychocandy View PostFair play. Its a personal choice.
It just rips my tulip when people on here have a dig about it as if you're doing the crime of the century when its all perfectly legal and above board.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeh different. I suspect if you tried to claim for redunancy from a company that you own you'd not get very far. Its probably in the t+cs.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostThinking about it - my policy is personal injury etc.... Not for being out of work.
I would do anything if I was in the tulip (dole office), but I would look to stack shelves first in the way.
Note, just to confirm, if you claim JSA the jobcentre will leave you alone for months. They're not that stupid. i.e. You won't be beating them off trying to give you jobs working in tesco. They realise its better for everyone if they give you a chance to go back doing what you normally do.
Leave a comment:
-
Fair play. Its a personal choice.Originally posted by gables View PostPC, I don't doubt the legality of it, but it's not about that for me. When I decided to become a contractor I knew what I was signing up to, bench time included, and it is quite different to what a factory worker signs up to. To me JSA is not for contractors between contracts.
It just rips my tulip when people on here have a dig about it as if you're doing the crime of the century when its all perfectly legal and above board.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Yesterday 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Leave a comment: