Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The latest immigration figures...."
Yep, 1948 and I believe it was initially funded using money from the Marshall Plan, which the US weren't too happy about. I think they wanted the money to be spent on US goods and services
So what's wrong with rules that do allow such people in and keep out the unskilled with no links to the UK? Hardly that difficult.
Such common sense rules would be deemed as racist, fascist, xenophobic, islamphobic, climate change denial, Nazi, homophobic, bigoted and not fit for purpose "in the 21st century".
We need to be compassionate and surrender our homes, jobs, dignity, history and forever apologise for the British Empire. If all the immigrants left tomorrow, the entire UK would collapse because we're obviously too thick and stupid to operate our own country. The 'on the verge of collapse and debt ridden' NHS would collapse without immigrants and we need to keep the 1 million or so British youth on the dole too.
So please, no more suggestions based on common sense. We need more suggestions based on compassion and other Progressive narratives which normally end with "...in the 21st century" or at least have a reference to "the NHS".
I must admit, I am surprised there are more non-EU immigrants than EU immigrants.
However, putting a quota on non-EU immigration would run rough shod over all sorts of long standing international agreements. It would also require a swathe of immigration law/policy to be changed. Would we be comfortable for example in denying entry to children of UK passport holders living overseas? Or what about British born people overseas who relinquished their UK citizenship and decide to move home? What about highly skilled migrants? What about people who previously had right of abode in the UK, left, and now want to return? Pandora's box of consequences me thinks.
Indeed, I wonder how we coped before Tony Blair got in to power?
Mind you, if this is true, one can see immigration in a better light. Top 5 China, India, Spain, Australia, Poland. None of the obvious low performers there.
Mind you, if this is true, one can see immigration in a better light. Top 5 China, India, Spain, Australia, Poland. None of the obvious low performers there.
I think you'll find that the current rules already keep out pretty much every non-EU unskilled person who doesn't have any links to the UK.
For example, if you are an Australian without any links to the UK and want to move to the UK long term, in most cases you will need to have at least a masters degree and collect enough points to get a Tier 1 visa, ie, be highly skilled.
Is plumber's earning 100 grand a year evidence of wages being supressed?
When I compare international salaries, the UK looks pretty good.
In another Daily Wail story, I seem to remember they were exposing Polish plumbers who left Poland as labourers and arrived here a week later as fully qualified heating engineers. Go figure.
Leave a comment: