Reply to: Why weren't they insured?

[rl4engc]

Of course! Try to pass on any of that lot too quickly and you might as well hand yourself straight in.

Yes but it'd be better moved somewhere (anywhere) apart from the property while the heat is still on. Bury it in some woods or summat because if plod does come round (and there's a good chance someone will inform or have suspicions ("I didn't see Dave all Easter bank holiday, and I know he had access to one of them core drills..")) then they have all the evidence they need.

If there's nowt on the premises but there's other evidence, at the very least they've got a nest egg they can dig up when they get out of chokey.

[vetran]

Don't they need some evidence rather than just suspicion?

well if they can't explain where the contents come from that would be a pretty good start.

[BrilloPad]

Don't they need some evidence rather than just suspicion?

[d000hg]

any reason why HMRC aren't all over the box holders because it sounds like they were using them to avoid tax.

Don't they need some evidence rather than just suspicion?

[barrydidit]

It's going to make life difficult for plod if there is a big bag of loot, and the owners can't identify what is theirs...

[BrilloPad]

So, they pull off one of the best planned and executed heists in modern times, then keep the bags of loot on their property for the following couple of months while they work out what to do with it?

Of course! Try to pass on any of that lot too quickly and you might as well hand yourself straight in.

[vetran]

any reason why HMRC aren't all over the box holders because it sounds like they were using them to avoid tax.

[lilelvis2000]

Any idea why the cops didn't respond to the initial alarm. It all seems to be hush hush on that bit.

[rl4engc]

So, they pull off one of the best planned and executed heists in modern times, then keep the bags of loot on their property for the following couple of months while they work out what to do with it?

[BrilloPad]

Hatton Garden heist: Scotland Yard says seven suspects have been arrested - Telegraph

Amazed it took that long for someone to grass them up.

[NotAllThere]

With all the contractions you're getting through you should've phoned the midwife by now!

We're mostly contractors here. So is it unreasonable to expect a little contractual ability?

do you line up your bean tins in order?

Just suggesting that you learn a few simple spelling rules so that you don't come across as quite such an uneducated, ignorant moron.

[psychocandy]

Like those people who go abroad on holidays, suffer illness/death or whatever then whine about it when they're stuck. Pisses me off.

[vetran]

@Vetran - in the contraction of "were not", the missing letter is the "o" in "not". So the correct contraction is "weren't". I fixed that one.

Similarly, when you are contracting "it is", the "i" in "is" is missing. So the contraction is "it's". It's really not very difficult.

do you line up your bean tins in order?

[tractor]

.....

@Vetran - in the contraction of "were not", the missing letter is the "o" in "not". So the correct contraction is "weren't". I fixed that one.

Similarly, when you are contracting "it is", the "i" in "is" is missing. So the contraction is "it's". It's really not very difficult.

With all the contractions you're getting through you should've phoned the midwife by now!

[NotAllThere]

@Vetran - in the contraction of "were not", the missing letter is the "o" in "not". So the correct contraction is "weren't". I fixed that one.

Similarly, when you are contracting "it is", the "i" in "is" is missing. So the contraction is "it's". It's really not very difficult.