Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IPSE plus
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IPSE plus"
Collapse
-
It's more that it'll be business as usual for some time, so if you're concerned about the risk you may as well get it (or some other insurance) now, especially considering how low the cost is. I think Labour has other plans, i.e. the FLC. I would not be surprised if the Tories now share their enthusiasm for this idea.
Leave a comment:
-
Even if that did happen you'd get plenty of notice of new laws, they wouldn't be passing it on May 8thOriginally posted by Unix View PostTrue, but with the election coming up and Labour likely to be in government the prospect of more IR35 like legislation might be in the pipeline.
Leave a comment:
-
True, but with the election coming up and Labour likely to be in government the prospect of more IR35 like legislation might be in the pipeline.Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostWhich, in particular? None of it really is changing the likelihood of being investigated, and it's not exactly pricy, so I'd consider it prudent to carry some form of cover regardless.
Leave a comment:
-
Which, in particular? None of it really is changing the likelihood of being investigated, and it's not exactly pricy, so I'd consider it prudent to carry some form of cover regardless.Originally posted by Unix View PostHaha no I was a pcg member a while back but thought with the new legislation it would be prudent to join now
Leave a comment:
-
He just has a different opinion.Originally posted by Unix View PostYou are not trolling right now
Leave a comment:
-
Haha no I was a pcg member a while back but thought with the new legislation it would be prudent to join nowOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostA year trolling the prof forums with 1600 posts and you have to ask this? What a ******* moron.
Oh hang on.. you're trolling again.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42



Leave a comment: