• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ed Miliband’s pledges"

Collapse

  • RoastedSlopes
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Except that one has no interest in business, comes from a party that has in the last two times it has been in power bankrupted the country as opposed to the other that has reinvigorated the economy on both of the last two occasions it has come into power.

    I would say there is quite a lot of difference between them.
    really? where have you been for the last 5 years then?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I think that throughout history it can be shown that those who "just got by" in school often go on to reach great success. Why? Because they just plain try harder than a bloke with A's who believe he can fetch a brilliant job any time he likes.

    People like Gary Kildall, Bill Gates, Steve jobs to name just three.
    It also helps if you have middle class parents who can help you.

    The people I've met who I've admired are those whose parents had SFA and had attitudes to match. However they tend to be the one out of the 5+ in their family who made it.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    That's hard to quantify really. Both sets of parents worked so that could be construed as a positive influence, but I know people from non-working backgrounds who've done well and vice versa so it's not an absolutism. At the end of the day I think it's lazy to use background as a definite reason of later failure in life. Admittedly it makes it harder.
    I think that throughout history it can be shown that those who "just got by" in school often go on to reach great success. Why? Because they just plain try harder than a bloke with A's who believe he can fetch a brilliant job any time he likes.

    People like Gary Kildall, Bill Gates, Steve jobs to name just three.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Oh do push off. I'm not a leftie. But it doesn't make economic sense to try and fix the economy by sanctioning benefits claimants - the savings are tiny and even more so in proportion to the inconvenience caused. Taking away someone's benefits for a month because they're a few minutes late to the JobCentre saves pennies only. And with unemployment falling, targeting those on benefits makes even less sense!
    I sort of agree the sanctions seem harsh but if justified they make a lot of sense.

    I think they have realised some little hitlers in the job centre need managing and haave tightened up the rules for sanctions. - which is a good thing.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/b...othing-culture

    https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...s-nov-2013.pdf

    From the tory loving granuiad as you can see benefits are a really large proportion of GDP.

    Benefits in Britain: separating the facts from the fiction | Politics | The Guardian

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    There is a lot of truth in that, also there is a fallacy that education is to blame. Lack of work ethic and can do attitude are a lot more to blame. Neither I or my better-half hold a degree level qualification but we have a joint household income well in excess of 150K. Both of us left school at 16 with a clutch of 'O' levels. However we are targets of envy amongst some relatives as its 'alright for us as we have lots of money'. Yet they wouldn't work away from home at times, feel comfortable on short volatile contracts or in my wife's case take on huge responsibilities heading up a 800 strong workforce.
    Oh but there's plenty of "pushers" of the education industry bubble. I think it's beginning to expose the ludicrous aim of 50%+ of the population having a degree, to cover up the holes left in pre-university education, e.g. employers when surveyed express concern about candidates being both innumerate and illiterate, and this includes those with degrees. You certainly don't "need" a degree to succeed, but this isn't the message getting across to young people. The educational system does not impart sound financial or entrepreneurial skills, either. In a sense, these are more crucial than knowing the ins and outs of WW2.

    Apprenticeships are one of the few of the more sensible things the government is promoting in this regard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattski View Post
    Sometimes I wish that AI WOULD overthrow the human race. I'd quite fancy being ruled by a cold, logical, amoral machine logic instead of the usual shower of idiots we end up with. Might make a refreshing change.
    WHS

    <---

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But where did you get your work ethic from? Parental influence or something that's inherently part of who you are?
    That's hard to quantify really. Both sets of parents worked so that could be construed as a positive influence, but I know people from non-working backgrounds who've done well and vice versa so it's not an absolutism. At the end of the day I think it's lazy to use background as a definite reason of later failure in life. Admittedly it makes it harder.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZARDOZ
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are a miserable ungrateful unappreciating little leftie. The current coalition have done wonders to achieve a turnaround in the economy without resorting to Thatcherite policies
    The "turnaround in the economy" was from another little Brownite style housing boom created by oiling the banks with public debt and artificially fixing interest rates. What could possibly go wrong with that?
    You can tell this is a fake recovery when you consider Italy has a higher level of productivity than the UK.
    In real terms this housing bubble has made those with savings and fixed incomes, e.g. pensioners poorer. In the meantime the national debt is at record levels and increasing every day. There is no miracle about what they have done, just more of the same boom to bust and passing forward the bill.
    Last edited by ZARDOZ; 16 March 2015, 14:24.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    There is a lot of truth in that, also there is a fallacy that education is to blame. Lack of work ethic and can do attitude are a lot more to blame. Neither I or my better-half hold a degree level qualification but we have a joint household income well in excess of 150K. Both of us left school at 16 with a clutch of 'O' levels. However we are targets of envy amongst some relatives as its 'alright for us as we have lots of money'. Yet they wouldn't work away from home at times, feel comfortable on short volatile contracts or in my wife's case take on huge responsibilities heading up a 800 strong workforce.
    But where did you get your work ethic from? Parental influence or something that's inherently part of who you are?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Hence why the EU migrants win the jobs and not the local populace. EU migrants don't come here for freebies - so all this "we will prevent benefit tourism" is just electioneering. If there is any tourism going on, it will be tiny. But its a fantastic way to cover up the real problem. UK dependency on very very cheap labour, rather than productive skilled labour. Lack of investment in improved processes etc..

    The economy might improve in a kind of coughing and spluttering way (especially in the forgotten hinterlands of the north) but no more improvement will be seen for a long time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    As a populace we are too "welded" to the welfare state, NHS and socialist institutions to want to change. The coalition have done wonders to get us all back to work. The fact that we are not earning enough is because we are not ambitious or hard working enough and too dishonest to blame ourselves
    There is a lot of truth in that, also there is a fallacy that education is to blame. Lack of work ethic and can do attitude are a lot more to blame. Neither I or my better-half hold a degree level qualification but we have a joint household income well in excess of 150K. Both of us left school at 16 with a clutch of 'O' levels. However we are targets of envy amongst some relatives as its 'alright for us as we have lots of money'. Yet they wouldn't work away from home at times, feel comfortable on short volatile contracts or in my wife's case take on huge responsibilities heading up a 800 strong workforce.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    It does look like the usual political sledgehammer, cost savings are incidental they know that

    But really it's an attack on the unworking Chatsworth class which is Labours core vote these days

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are a miserable ungrateful unappreciating little leftie. The current coalition have done wonders to achieve a turnaround in the economy without resorting to Thatcherite policies This Coalition can be compared with our greatest governments - Telegraph
    As for poverty there is only so much a government can do. The electorate would not stand for the reforms needed to reduce poverty or improve the NHS. A bit of gratitude even though it flies in the face of the bigoted left wing position is due
    Oh do push off. I'm not a leftie. But it doesn't make economic sense to try and fix the economy by sanctioning benefits claimants - the savings are tiny and even more so in proportion to the inconvenience caused. Taking away someone's benefits for a month because they're a few minutes late to the JobCentre saves pennies only. And with unemployment falling, targeting those on benefits makes even less sense!

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The fact that we are not earning enough is because we are not ambitious or hard working enough and too dishonest to blame ourselves
    That perfectly sums up an 'Agent'.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Education seems to have been in a state of flux over the past 20 years. We'll find out if it has been improved. Salaries for skilled people are so piss poor in the UK that brain-drain will increase I figure. So the UK will be no better off.

    PFI is a scam, nothing but a scam to leave future generations in poverty. But overall its a tiny percentage of GDP. Main problem I see in the UK is a lack of investment in technology, lack of investment in tools to improve productivity and tulip wages.

    We are eating our children for our own materialist gains. When I look at my kids, I wonder what crap they will be left with .
    As a populace we are too "welded" to the welfare state, NHS and socialist institutions to want to change. The coalition have done wonders to get us all back to work. The fact that we are not earning enough is because we are not ambitious or hard working enough and too dishonest to blame ourselves

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X