• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IR35 and Agile (XP)"

Collapse

  • rob s
    replied
    Will the pair test be purely functional or also include some kind of standards assessment?
    Beyond a general solution architecture, will the choice of how something is developed be your choice?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jatra
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Using Windows XP is clear evidence of being told what to do. If you really want to look independent, use Vista.
    Good advice I'm think of switching to Windows 3.1 to really prove my independence. Anyone got a 3.5inch drive I could attach to my macbook?


    I note that a few replies have assumed Scrum. That's probably due to the way most companies seem to think Agile implies Scrum, so a fair assumption (although not in this case). With any luck, companies will soon move on. Using a fixed methodology to achieve agility seems to me to be oxymoronic. I've often been in retrospectives where it's been obvious that a more ad hoc process can be beneficial.

    In terms of D&C, however tasks are allocated, there's still the "how" that's significant. But I'm guessing it's standard that contractors within a team have to follow team practice!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    What teams don't do that? None that I've ever been part of.
    There is a common theme there...

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    IR35 has nothing to do with what version of Windows you are using... Really.. some people. Sheesh
    Using Windows XP is clear evidence of being told what to do. If you really want to look independent, use Vista.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Scrum teams are self organising which means you all come up with the tasks. Then you all decide, based on various criteria which are team dependent, how they are to be tackled.

    The product owner should be saying what they want done in the sprint but its up to the team to sort out the finer detail.
    What teams don't do that? None that I've ever been part of.

    My experience of Scrum/Agile is that you spend the first hour of every meeting arguing over what Scrum/Agile means.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Joining a dev team as a contractor to bulk up the numbers short term does not make you inside IR35. You're still vulnerable to the client's whims "oh, there's nothing to do this week", etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
    Pretty sure that's not true. Unless you mean that given tasks a-z you get to choose which one you want to do first, assuming theres a choice left.
    Scrum teams are self organising which means you all come up with the tasks. Then you all decide, based on various criteria which are team dependent, how they are to be tackled.

    The product owner should be saying what they want done in the sprint but its up to the team to sort out the finer detail.

    In cases where you have to work where people aren't following the process properly and you have to pair, pair with more inexperienced people or other contractors.

    In short there is lots of room in scrum teams to avoid D&C as long as you are proactive.

    Also no company will want to admit their agile/scrum process is incorrect. If they aren't allowing the team enough autonomy then be proactive....
    Last edited by SueEllen; 9 March 2015, 07:56.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingcook
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    IR35 has nothing to do with what version of Windows you are using... Really.. some people. Sheesh
    Errrrrr......

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by TheLordDave View Post
    as one of the key agile/scrum principles is that you are not tasked and choose what work you want to deliver.
    Pretty sure that's not true. Unless you mean that given tasks a-z you get to choose which one you want to do first, assuming theres a choice left.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    IR35 has nothing to do with what version of Windows you are using... Really.. some people. Sheesh

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    If you're doing Scrum properly you can argue as the team is self organising there's no D&C. It's all a question of perspective.
    This as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Break down the points you have raised, put each one onto a post it, stick them up on the information radiator on the correct lane, feel free to notify the team tomorrow morning at the stand up.

    Feel free to identify the most senior agile proponent in the client co organisation your Ltd is helping and kick the living crap out of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    If you're doing Scrum properly you can argue as the team is self organising there's no D&C. It's all a question of perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Yes, do as the permies do. Oh and don't forget your paid holiday, free pension, sickness, private medical, employee share scheme, and redundancy package too.

    Your're a permie after all, tax man says we all are, so we must be.

    And while your at it, stop paying into that ISA, since it shelters your earnings from tax, which can't be fair can it?

    PS with regard to being cut out for contracting, no, way too spineless and pathetic. Have you thought of a career in politics?
    And your wife divorced you on what grounds?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jatra
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Yes, do as the permies do. Oh and don't forget your paid holiday, free pension, sickness, private medical, employee share scheme, and redundancy package too.

    Your're a permie after all, tax man says we all are, so we must be.

    And while your at it, stop paying into that ISA, since it shelters your earnings from tax, which can't be fair can it?

    PS with regard to being cut out for contracting, no, way too spineless and pathetic. Have you thought of a career in politics?
    Very droll. Especially the bit about politics followed by "Vote for UKIP"

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X