I'm not so sure about Renault. They've had a whole year - since the 2014 season started - to work on the new engine and seem to have stuffed up.
I think Honda will be making massive steps forward though.
Come on Ferrari, give Manor one of your 2015 engines...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: 2015 Formula 1 Thread
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "2015 Formula 1 Thread"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ZARDOZ View PostHow wrong can you be.
However, as has been seen many times, basing predicted results on winter testing is never a good idea
Leave a comment:
-
Ferrari are doing a snazzy summary of each race on their website, here's Malaysia. Scroll to the bottom of the page to see links for the other races this season.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostWell this race, VDG isn't eligible to drive as he hasn't got a license. So the team are allowed to field a replacement.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNo but if you only have 2 spaces you have a real problem if you've sold them 3 times and all 3 turn up....
How difficult is it to match 2 and 2. Some had an almighty **** up.
Leave a comment:
-
Well this race, VDG isn't eligible to drive as he hasn't got a license. So the team are allowed to field a replacement.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostBBC Sport - Australian GP: Sauber team principal could face prison
It just gets crazier and crazier. Bailiffs hanging around to seize the cars from the garage, VDG appearing in the garage in his race-suit!
Is a team allowed more than two drivers, on some sort of rota system, if they wished to?
Leave a comment:
-
BBC Sport - Australian GP: Sauber team principal could face prison
It just gets crazier and crazier. Bailiffs hanging around to seize the cars from the garage, VDG appearing in the garage in his race-suit!
Is a team allowed more than two drivers, on some sort of rota system, if they wished to?
Leave a comment:
-
No doubt they'll pay him off. After all a contract doesn't mean that you have to do something, just that you have to pay compensation if you don't.
I guess the question is is the cost of this more or less than the amount they'd lose from the sponsorship of one of the other two. The car's blue and yellow because those are the colours of Nasr's sponsor Banco do Brasil, so it won't be him.
Leave a comment:
-
BBC Sport - Sauber driver Giedo van der Garde wins court case to claim race seat
This is kind of interesting. He's legally won the race seat but hasn't been involved in the development, hasn't been in the car, doesn't even have a seat that fits.
A team being forced to run a driver they don't want... that surely can't possibly work. So will they just pay him a wodge of cash, is that what he's after, or does he genuinely just want to be in an F1 car by any means? It's not like Sauber have a lot of money to spare anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Brawn inherited an amazing car developed by the previous team, and then had no money to develop it. They did not end the season with an advantage - they were not the fastest car - so it's not a fair comparison. Teams who end the season with massive dominance do not tend to lose that.
Leave a comment:
-
Brawn had the early season advantage with an idea nobody else had picked up on but they didn't have the resources to maintain the necessary level of development. By mid-season the rest had almost caught up. Mercedes aren't in that position.
Never rated Vettel; fine when the car was matched to his driving style, but when they killed off some of the exhaust-blown options he suddenly looked very ordinary and he failed totally to adapt to the new formula. He's nowhere near Hamilton of Riccardo and he won't have the Ferrari team on his side yet either. The real fight will be between Mercedes and Red Bull.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI can't see why Mercedes wouldn't win both championships - historically when one team achieves such dominance following big rule changes, they do retain that advantage for a time.
Normally new rules mean someone has a bigger advantage, and then it closes up with stability, and especially the smaller teams are able to catch up. Hard to say from testing; this time last year Red Bull were nowhere yet managed to win three races.
As for Vettel, I think he'll get his motivation back and be a more serious threat this year. People like to put him down, but he obviously was doing something right for those four years, and it's probably fair to say once he realised he wasn't going to win the championship again in 2014 he lost interest.
We'll see. Only a week and a half to go.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: