Originally posted by SantaClaus
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Tonight's entertaining news article
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Tonight's entertaining news article"
Collapse
-
this seems to be a common complaint, I suspect they have the zeal of a do gooder (or someone on bonus) driving them.
-
"When a vehicle is parked where parking is permitted, authorities mustOriginally posted by vetran View Post
not73 immobilise or remove in the first 30 minutes following the issuing
of the PCN, with the exception of ‘persistent evader’ vehicles (see
paragraphs 8.105 to 8.107 below) where the time limit is 15 minutes."
Interesting. In my case, they didn't wait 30 mins. They hadn't even issued the ticket yet.
They stopped the truck at my car and started attaching the lifting gear immediately.
Leave a comment:
-
section 8.88
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...orcepolicy.pdf
Where a vehicle is causing
a hazard or obstruction the enforcement authority should remove
rather than immobilise. Immobilisation/removal activity should only
take place where it gives clear traffic management benefits.If a driver returns to the vehicle whilst immobilisation or removal
is taking place, then, unless they are a persistent evader, it is
recommended that the operation is halted, unless the clamp is
secured or the vehicle has all its wheels aboard the tow truck. If
immobilisation or removal is halted, the PCN should still be enforced.When a vehicle is parked where parking is permitted, authorities must
not73 immobilise or remove in the first 30 minutes following the issuing
of the PCN, with the exception of ‘persistent evader’ vehicles (see
paragraphs 8.105 to 8.107 below) where the time limit is 15 minutes.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm guessing that over the 6 hours and once word had spread then any number of armchair lawyers would have advised him on his rights. Hence the shift from "please please don't tow my car" to "That's it I'm suing."
Leave a comment:
-
If they are that worried about disabled bays they should try Slough pretty much half the parkers in them seem up for the 800 metres.
It sort of sounds like half and half, the muppet parking illegally and the tow truck coming too quickly with the Police.
I do think this obsession with towing immediately needs looking at, I suspect the law doesn't favour such.
Leave a comment:
-
I actually did the same once in Crouch End - wasn't parked in a disabled bay, just parked wrongly in a controlled zone because of confusing signage.
Unknown to me, Haringay council's tow truck drives up and down the high street at precisely the confusing time, until some mug (me) pops into M&S.
Anyway, standing in the queue, I saw the gear being attached to my car, so I sprinted out of M&S and sat in it. Eventually they gave up, removed the lifting gear and issued me with a ticket.
I disputed the ticket on the basis of the signage being misleading and paid nothing.
No doubt they do this again and again, cause a) they have all the time in the world b) it's not their money and c) it's a jolly good wheeze.Last edited by SantaClaus; 23 December 2014, 22:23.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View PostApparently the council backed off and released the car.
Bennetts Hill parking stand-off: Defiant driver WINS battle with parking officials - Birmingham MailGood luck with that then“That’s all I wanted from the beginning,” he said, adding that he now plans to sue Birmingham City Council for loss of earnings.
“I fully intend to sue,” he told the Birmingham Mail.
Leave a comment:
-
Parking in Disabled Bays is one of my pet hates and a display of such arrogance that I'd rather see him and his car crushed.
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently the council backed off and released the car.
Bennetts Hill parking stand-off: Defiant driver WINS battle with parking officials - Birmingham Mail
Leave a comment:
-
Well someone's given him a cup of coffee. So presumably at some point he'll need a pee.
Leave a comment:
-
Tonight's entertaining news article
BBC News - Man in Birmingham disabled parking bay tow stand-off
A driver who wrongly parked in a disabled bay in Birmingham has been sitting in his car for more than six hours to stop it being towed away.
Who's gonna blink first?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29

Leave a comment: