• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Al Sweady Inquiry - Is this some sort of joke?"

Collapse

  • alluvial
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
    I don't think anyone's said we should start cutting heads off with a blunt kitchen knife yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by alluvial View Post
    The Al Sweady Inquiry into mistreatment of Iraqi insurgents after the Battle of Danny Boy.



    FFS
    What are the army supposed to do? Sit them down with a nice cup of tea, give them a bit of a cuddle and ask them nicely if they'd mind spilling the beans on their chums?
    Maybe all army interrogators should be trained in Spanish Inquisition techniques and have comfy chairs and cushions issued as standard equipment.
    You really couldn't make this stuff up.
    Well, next time we could save ourselves the trouble, a load more money, thousands of lives and not go invade some random country.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    no but we could have withdrawn legal aid when it appeared the opposition were on a fishing trip. Or better make the lawyers responsible for costs when it was proven they had knowingly lied.

    disbar a few "pour encourager les Autres".
    Im all for the due process \ course of law and all that. I used to work on Civil Legal Aid when a permie and one of the conditions of a successful claim was they had to have a better than 50% chance of winning in court.

    Im not sure if this was persued under civil or criminal LA scheme.

    The problem with these shyster ambulance chasing lawyers \ solicitors is, they'd probably pull some other obscure reasons why LA shouldnt be pulled. What makes matters worse, is that the two law firms involved actively went to Iraq touting for business!

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    No Iraqi official signed a surrender document, the US marched in and occupied it, George Bush stood on an Aircraft carrier and unilaterally declared the war over. This happened in 2004.
    So I think these guys should be treated like any other POW's.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?

    the bastids would end up getting better treatment than the squaddies.

    'YOU, YES YOU, you horrible little scouse cnt. put your pigswill down and take that nice mr taliban a cup of tea and a chockie bikky. ask him if hes been naughty'

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
    Simply notify the world that after 1/1/2015 no prisoners will be taken. Problem solved. You do know they have a choice whether to ambush poeple or cut the heads off aid workers and journalists.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    I can imagine where this bleeding heart liberalisation is going but just to be clear, what are you trying to say by 'So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
    no but we could have withdrawn legal aid when it appeared the opposition were on a fishing trip. Or better make the lawyers responsible for costs when it was proven they had knowingly lied.

    disbar a few "pour encourager les Autres".

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    To beat the monster you have to become the monster

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    I can imagine where this bleeding heart liberalisation is going but just to be clear, what are you trying to say by 'So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    It's not a joke.

    They've spent 5 years and £30million on it..
    Because the solicitors kept pushing these unfounded claims and their 'clients' kept changing their stories.

    Fallon has just said he's referring the two solicitors firms for investigation and attempt to recover some costs. Obviously, its going to be nowhere near the 30 million cost to the taxpayer.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    It's not a joke.

    They've spent 5 years and £30million on it..
    OMG! That's nearly as much as you charge!

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Just shows you cant trust a ******* terrorist. As for their lawyers........

    It grips my tulip this nonsense. We send young lads (and girls soon?) to put their lives on the line, pay them, what, £200 a week and fight these terrorist.

    Then we expect them to behave like they were in some private club function and behave perfectly after they have been shot at or seen comrades blown up?

    Haha, just hearing the lawyers for these iraqi's are to be investigated. Good show, what?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    It's not a joke.

    They've spent 5 years and £30million OF OUR MONEY on it..

    FTFY




    Shock horror if you ask terrorists nicely they don't tell you anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • alluvial
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    It's not a joke.

    They've spent 5 years and £30million on it..
    Mad isn't it?
    Although I am glad that they went to the trouble of disproving the more serious allegations, the findings of mistreatment because they shouted at them is mental.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X