Originally posted by NickFitz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Al Sweady Inquiry - Is this some sort of joke?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by alluvial View PostThe Al Sweady Inquiry into mistreatment of Iraqi insurgents after the Battle of Danny Boy.
FFS
What are the army supposed to do? Sit them down with a nice cup of tea, give them a bit of a cuddle and ask them nicely if they'd mind spilling the beans on their chums?
Maybe all army interrogators should be trained in Spanish Inquisition techniques and have comfy chairs and cushions issued as standard equipment.
You really couldn't make this stuff up.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postno but we could have withdrawn legal aid when it appeared the opposition were on a fishing trip. Or better make the lawyers responsible for costs when it was proven they had knowingly lied.
disbar a few "pour encourager les Autres".
Im not sure if this was persued under civil or criminal LA scheme.
The problem with these shyster ambulance chasing lawyers \ solicitors is, they'd probably pull some other obscure reasons why LA shouldnt be pulled. What makes matters worse, is that the two law firms involved actively went to Iraq touting for business!
Leave a comment:
-
No Iraqi official signed a surrender document, the US marched in and occupied it, George Bush stood on an Aircraft carrier and unilaterally declared the war over. This happened in 2004.
So I think these guys should be treated like any other POW's.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostSo we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
the bastids would end up getting better treatment than the squaddies.
'YOU, YES YOU, you horrible little scouse cnt. put your pigswill down and take that nice mr taliban a cup of tea and a chockie bikky. ask him if hes been naughty'
Leave a comment:
-
...
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostSo we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostI can imagine where this bleeding heart liberalisation is going but just to be clear, what are you trying to say by 'So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
disbar a few "pour encourager les Autres".
Leave a comment:
-
I can imagine where this bleeding heart liberalisation is going but just to be clear, what are you trying to say by 'So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
Leave a comment:
-
So we should prove that we're better than them by reducing ourselves to their level?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostIt's not a joke.
They've spent 5 years and £30million on it..
Fallon has just said he's referring the two solicitors firms for investigation and attempt to recover some costs. Obviously, its going to be nowhere near the 30 million cost to the taxpayer.
Leave a comment:
-
Just shows you cant trust a ******* terrorist. As for their lawyers........
It grips my tulip this nonsense. We send young lads (and girls soon?) to put their lives on the line, pay them, what, £200 a week and fight these terrorist.
Then we expect them to behave like they were in some private club function and behave perfectly after they have been shot at or seen comrades blown up?
Haha, just hearing the lawyers for these iraqi's are to be investigated. Good show, what?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostIt's not a joke.
They've spent 5 years and £30million on it..
Although I am glad that they went to the trouble of disproving the more serious allegations, the findings of mistreatment because they shouted at them is mental.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: