Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Sense or silly: 8 months in the slammer for gatecrashing a motor race?"
I think the sentence fits that crime for the reasons mentioned by the judge, but I do have a serious issue with the fact that people get less or suspended sentences for crimes involving assaults and theft.
I don't care about what's fair for him, but it does seem unfair for the victims of the latter category. That said, in this case, his refusal to show any remorse probably did a lot to help him get a prison sentence. I reckon if he'd involved a lawyer earlier and listened to him, made a profuse apology etc he'd have probably got away without prison time.
How bizarre. It doesn't really seem the kind of thing jail is designed for but as mentioned it was intended as a strong deterrent to other silly boys who might want to emulate him.
Thoughts? Other than calling him a chavvy moron, which we can take as read
Leave a comment: