• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "We can land a probe on a comet 300 million miles away....."

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I worked here once
    Who would have thought the market day bus service between Yeadon and Guisely was so complicated to operate?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I worked here once

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Nobody likes a story topper

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Just passing on. One of my colleagues went to Uni with a science journalist who is closer than you or I to the goings on.
    Not as close as me, I only live 5 minutes walk from the control room And where I used to work:



    And the end result of my work:

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    I don't see what's so difficult, it's not rocket science is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    Can't they send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in a Shuttle to fix it?
    Please God no Aerosmith ballads.

    Liv Tyler in a flimsy dress yes.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    Can't they send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in a Shuttle to fix it?
    xkcd.com

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Can't they send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in a Shuttle to fix it?

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The harpoons didn't fire.

    Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.

    Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.
    Just passing on. One of my colleagues went to Uni with a science journalist who is closer than you or I to the goings on.

    This is what he said :

    The harpoons did not fire.
    The thruster did not fire.
    The screws did not activate.
    The first bounce was 450m high, and lasted 2 hours.
    The second bounce only lasted 8 minutes. So it landed 3 times.

    As the screws did not activate it is not currently possible to drill into the rock to take samples as the net weight of the thing is only 4 grammes and it would just lift off if the drill was deployed.

    The orbiter gets line of sight this morning and they will assess the situation further.

    Not game over, but very, very complicated.

    Hope this helps.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Check out this picture of the runway marshall

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Current status is that it has landed (twice) and is still landed, and is stable.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The harpoons didn't fire.

    Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.

    Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.
    Redundancy. And I don't mean the scientists.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    Apparently it appears it might have bounced when the anchoring harpoons fired.

    Now it's easy for me to be an armchair rocket scientist, but a few hours ago I was pondering how they were going to attach it to the surface. I was thinking - they can't use harpoons because of Newton's third law - equal and opposite reaction and all that

    The harpoons didn't fire.

    Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.

    Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Apparently it appears it might have bounced when the anchoring harpoons fired.

    Now it's easy for me to be an armchair rocket scientist, but a few hours ago I was pondering how they were going to attach it to the surface. I was thinking - they can't use harpoons because of Newton's third law - equal and opposite reaction and all that

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Humor'ish

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X