Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We can land a probe on a comet 300 million miles away....."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostJust passing on. One of my colleagues went to Uni with a science journalist who is closer than you or I to the goings on.
And the end result of my work:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stek View PostCan't they send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in a Shuttle to fix it?
Liv Tyler in a flimsy dress yes.
qh
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stek View PostCan't they send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in a Shuttle to fix it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThe harpoons didn't fire.
Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.
Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.
This is what he said :
The harpoons did not fire.
The thruster did not fire.
The screws did not activate.
The first bounce was 450m high, and lasted 2 hours.
The second bounce only lasted 8 minutes. So it landed 3 times.
As the screws did not activate it is not currently possible to drill into the rock to take samples as the net weight of the thing is only 4 grammes and it would just lift off if the drill was deployed.
The orbiter gets line of sight this morning and they will assess the situation further.
Not game over, but very, very complicated.
Hope this helps.
Leave a comment:
-
Current status is that it has landed (twice) and is still landed, and is stable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThe harpoons didn't fire.
Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.
Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by centurian View PostApparently it appears it might have bounced when the anchoring harpoons fired.
Now it's easy for me to be an armchair rocket scientist, but a few hours ago I was pondering how they were going to attach it to the surface. I was thinking - they can't use harpoons because of Newton's third law - equal and opposite reaction and all that
Still, you would have thought that a team of rocket scientists would have thought of that some time in the twenty-five years they've been working on it.
Oh, hang on, they did: the idea was that a thruster on top of it would fire at the same time as the harpoons were shot into the surface, to counteract the recoil.
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently it appears it might have bounced when the anchoring harpoons fired.
Now it's easy for me to be an armchair rocket scientist, but a few hours ago I was pondering how they were going to attach it to the surface. I was thinking - they can't use harpoons because of Newton's third law - equal and opposite reaction and all that
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: