Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "For the love of God particle, no! (Or, Higgs ain't what it used to be)"
I thought they said it might not be Higgs, but some entirely new branch of physics which happens to act just like Higgs. ...
I can see where they're coming from, although expressed like that it sounds like claiming William Shakespeare didn't write his plays but the author was someone else called William Shakespeare.
I thought they said it might not be Higgs, but some entirely new branch of physics which happens to act just like Higgs.
Now, in practice that's not an uncommon way for physics to progress, but on the other hand we tend to prefer the simplest explanation which fits the observed facts.
Leave a comment: