• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What Climate change?"

Collapse

  • WTFH
    replied
    Is this the Mail hedging its bets - if the Tories don't end up winning, then the Mail can point out how Labour is responsible for climate change, but is doing nothing about it...

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    What Climate change?


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...ming-1912.html

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Coal is renewable...

    ...if you wait long enough.
    Not any more - The Carboniferous age started when plants first evolved the ability to make lignin, and ended when the first moulds evolved the ability to digest lignin. Unfortunately those moulds are still around, so dead wood no longer forms coal deposits.

    But oil is renewable, forming in marine deposits, if you wait fifteen million years or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Coal is renewable...

    ...if you wait long enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Renewables provide more than half UK electricity for first time - BBC News

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Happy Birthday!

    Here are the full results of 2 years rigourous and intensive investigation into that 'fiddled' data, in full:

    All submissions — The International Temperature Data Review Project


    Some might say an apology of some kind is due. I am not holding my breath.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    We'll be glad of all the warming when we get a huge eruption and ensuing volcano winter.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Q: How does one go about reconstructing temperatures in the past?

    A: Changes in Earth’s temperature for the last ~160 years are determined from instrumental data, such as thermometers on the ground or, for more recent times, satellites looking down from space. Beyond about 160 years ago, we must turn to other methods that indirectly record temperature (called “proxies”) for reconstructing past temperatures. For example, tree rings, calibrated to temperature over the instrumental era, provide one way of determining temperatures in the past, but few trees extend beyond the past few centuries or millennia. To develop a longer record, we used primarily marine and terrestrial fossils, biomolecules, or isotopes that were recovered from ocean and lake sediments and ice cores. All of these proxies have been independently calibrated to provide reliable estimates of temperature.

    Q: Did you collect and measure the ocean and land temperature data from all 73 sites?

    A: No. All of the datasets were previously generated and published in peer-reviewed scientific literature by other researchers over the past 15 years. Most of these datasets are freely available at several World Data Centers (see links below); those not archived as such were graciously made available to us by the original authors. We assembled all these published data into an easily used format, and in some cases updated the calibration of older data using modern state-of-the-art calibrations. We made all the data available for download free-of-charge from the Science web site (see link below). Our primary contribution was to compile these local temperature records into “stacks” that reflect larger-scale changes in regional and global temperatures. We used methods that carefully consider potential sources of uncertainty in the data, including uncertainty in proxy calibration and in dating of the samples (see step-by-step methods below).
    Response by Marcott et al. « RealClimate

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    Ooh! It looks like a gert hockey stick...

    And how do we know those were the actual temperatures going way back when?

    I mean, it's not like there was anyone around to measure them.
    The figures are just made up. I mean - these people are scientists and experts, so you obviously can't trust them.

    I genuinely don't have a clue.
    We are well aware of that.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    I read a report somewhere on the Web that one of the key sea level measuring stations has registered zero increase in sea level since 1993.
    I read a report somewhere, well on the University of Colorado website actually, that uses all the measurements from satellite altimeters to estimate the global trend ...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I'm combating this rising man made heat with colder man made beer.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    So if we reforest to much and reduce the amount of co2 could we just trigger a new ice age

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    I read a report somewhere on the Web that one of the key sea level measuring stations has registered zero increase in sea level since 1993.

    However we have been reducing or trying to reduce our consumption since then especially cfc's which were causing the hole in the ozone layer.......

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    Ooh! It looks like a gert hockey stick...

    And how do we know those were the actual temperatures going way back when?

    I mean, it's not like there was anyone around to measure them.

    Just wondering. I genuinely don't have a clue.
    Ohhhhh Martin, you are a one, again

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    replied
    Ooh! It looks like a gert hockey stick...

    And how do we know those were the actual temperatures going way back when?

    I mean, it's not like there was anyone around to measure them.

    Just wondering. I genuinely don't have a clue.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X