• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Churchill - Racist and White Supremacist"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Another revoting leftie with an inferiority/guilt complex
    Now you're laying into Churchill too?!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Winston Churchill wanted the RAF to wipe out German villages in retaliation for the massacre of Czech civilians in the village of Lidice, wartime cabinet documents have revealed.

    The plan to attack small villages "on a three-for-one basis" was formed in the summer of 1942 five days after German forces murdered most of the 450 occupants of Lidice, a village north of Prague, in retaliation for the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, deputy leader of the SS.
    Yes. That would have really affected Hitler.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Churchill was a two-faced underhanded scheming unscrupulous zealot.
    Fortunately for us, at the very time he came to prominence, the nation had vital need of a two-faced underhanded scheming unscrupulous zealot.
    Without him we may not have triumphed in WWII.
    The British people realised this, and once the war was done and dusted he got the bum's rush.
    Horses for courses and all that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
    Treated Bomber Harris awfully made him the scapegoat for Dresden, et al. and Bomber Command in general after following his directives during the bombing campaigns.

    Always a politician first was Winnie.

    qh
    Yes, he was an advocate of reprisal bombing on civilian targets.

    Churchill proposed 'three for one' bombing of German villages in retaliation for massacre of Czech civilians | UK news | The Guardian

    Winston Churchill wanted the RAF to wipe out German villages in retaliation for the massacre of Czech civilians in the village of Lidice, wartime cabinet documents have revealed.

    [...]

    The plan to attack small villages "on a three-for-one basis" was formed in the summer of 1942 five days after German forces murdered most of the 450 occupants of Lidice, a village north of Prague, in retaliation for the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, deputy leader of the SS.

    Churchill abandoned the plan only in the face of opposition from cabinet colleagues, who feared that the lives of aircrews would be placed needlessly at risk. Clement Attlee, the dominions secretary and future Labour prime minister, said he believed it unwise "to enter into competition in frightfulness with the Germans". On June 15 Churchill conceded, saying: "My instinct is strongly the other way ... I submit unwillingly to the view of cabinet against."

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Treated Bomber Harris awfully made him the scapegoat for Dresden, et al. and Bomber Command in general after following his directives during the bombing campaigns.

    Always a politician first was Winnie.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Yep it was different era with different views and morals.

    The one thing I think when I see people complaining long dead person is racist / homophobic.... is that they aren't bright. If the only way you look at things is through today's morals they will be very surprised when the next generation of fools think the same about them.
    The biggest critique of Churchill that I know (and in the interest of fairness there are disputes around it, and certainly there were other more critical factors than Churchill's attitudes and policies) relates to the Bengal famine:

    Generally the estimates are between 1.5 and 4 million,considering death due to starvation, malnutrition and disease, out of Bengal's 60.3 million population.
    By August 1943 Churchill refused to release shipping to send food to India. Initially during the famine he was more concerned with the civilians of Nazi occupied Greece (who were also suffering from a famine) compared with the Bengalis, noting that the “starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis is less serious than that of sturdy Greeks”
    Bengal famine of 1943 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Yep it was different era with different views and morals.

    The one thing I think when I see people complaining long dead person is racist / homophobic.... is that they aren't bright. If the only way you look at things is through today's morals they will be very surprised when the next generation of fools think the same about them.
    Yeah you hear people moaning about Hitler all the time, but back then Jew killing was the done thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    My favourite anti Gandhi smear is that he used to sleep naked with his teenage nieces to test his purity.

    As for Churchill, it see unlikely that he believed that all races were equal. WGAS nowadays.
    Yep it was different era with different views and morals.

    The one thing I think when I see people complaining long dead person is racist / homophobic.... is that they aren't bright. If the only way you look at things is through today's morals they will be very surprised when the next generation of fools think the same about them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
    I have no idea. Don't really care.
    But I'm sure there'd be the same outrage if someone said the same about Ghandi - but it's true! (well... not the whet supremacist bit).
    My favourite anti Gandhi smear is that he used to sleep naked with his teenage nieces to test his purity.

    As for Churchill, it see unlikely that he believed that all races were equal. WGAS nowadays.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Another revoting leftie with an inferiority/guilt complex

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    I have no idea. Don't really care.
    But I'm sure there'd be the same outrage if someone said the same about Ghandi - but it's true! (well... not the whet supremacist bit).

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
    According to Labour candidate.

    Link

    Also has ulcerative Colitis & takes drugs so I heard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gittins Gal
    started a topic Churchill - Racist and White Supremacist

    Churchill - Racist and White Supremacist

    According to Labour candidate.

    Link

Working...
X