• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Jihad on dogs

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Jihad on dogs"

Collapse

  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    Was slightly disappointed when I opened this thread, to find that it wasn't a news story from sunny Huddersfield, or has the doggy jihad been in place there for a while ??
    I'm tempted to launch one against the baskets opposite who leave theirs yapping and whining outside. But no, as yet there haven't been any reports of anti canine towel heads roaming the streets with meat cleavers and a tin of Ceasar. I'll keep you posted.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Was slightly disappointed when I opened this thread, to find that it wasn't a news story from sunny Huddersfield, or has the doggy jihad been in place there for a while ??

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    Considering the lack of homosexual suicide bombers is it any wonder, the PC brigade must be up in arms about their homophobia

    They don't even have equal opportunities suicide bombers!
    Oh but they do http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-purposes.html

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    And chuck in that Muslims as a group are detested more than atheists and homosexuals and you have gravy train of eyes wanting to find out what "the muzzies are demanding be changed now".
    Considering the lack of homosexual suicide bombers is it any wonder, the PC brigade must be up in arms about their homophobia

    They don't even have equal opportunities suicide bombers!

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    And chuck in that Muslims as a group are detested more than atheists and homosexuals and you have gravy train of eyes wanting to find out what "the muzzies are demanding be changed now".

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    So, essentially the DT is trying to be like the DM.
    Race to the bottom. The Telegraph has abandoned its heritage as a news reporting institution, and merely seeks "clicks". See Private Eye passim.

    I think it was the most recent issue of the Eye that told how one of the few journalists left at the Telegraph had used their journalistic skills to do online research that uncovered that somebody claiming to be a "digital media specialist" in order to get a high-profile job was, in fact, nothing of the kind, and didn't even have the degree they claimed to have from a top American university.

    The lying "digital media specialist" was the new top bod at the Telegraph.

    The journalist, rather than being rewarded for demonstrating their ability to bring their skills to bear on digital media issues, was sacked.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    • Says "tulip" on the telly;

    • Mocks a disabled MP for his disability;

    • Blames male adultery on women;

    • Fined and jailed for contempt of court;

    • Various acts of petty racism.
    Sounds like an average day on CUK...

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The two blokes who are quoted by the Telegraph both seem to have form for seeking to provoke controversy.

    Mohamad Sabu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - in which the disliker of dogs insults the memory of a bunch of police officers who were killed by Communist rebels in 1950, and who are generally regarded as national heroes.

    But that's nothing compared to the attention-seeking of the other one: Ibrahim Ali (Malaysia) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    • Says "tulip" on the telly;

    • Mocks a disabled MP for his disability;

    • Blames male adultery on women;

    • Fined and jailed for contempt of court;

    • Various acts of petty racism.


    I also note that, despite the Telegraph's hand-wringing, nobody has thought the comments about dogs sufficiently interesting to add to their Wikipedia pages, which would surely have happened by now if anybody in Malaysia gave a toss about what they said.
    So, essentially the DT is trying to be like the DM.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    The two blokes who are quoted by the Telegraph both seem to have form for seeking to provoke controversy.

    Mohamad Sabu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - in which the disliker of dogs insults the memory of a bunch of police officers who were killed by Communist rebels in 1950, and who are generally regarded as national heroes.

    But that's nothing compared to the attention-seeking of the other one: Ibrahim Ali (Malaysia) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    • Says "tulip" on the telly;

    • Mocks a disabled MP for his disability;

    • Blames male adultery on women;

    • Fined and jailed for contempt of court;

    • Various acts of petty racism.


    I also note that, despite the Telegraph's hand-wringing, nobody has thought the comments about dogs sufficiently interesting to add to their Wikipedia pages, which would surely have happened by now if anybody in Malaysia gave a toss about what they said.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They seem to hate almost everything else in creation, including variations on themselves, so why should lizards & GALs be left out?
    "When Abraham was thrown into the fire, all animals started to put it out, except the lizard, it started flaring it up."



    You've only got yourself to blame.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Do Muslims hate lizards?

    Just wondering
    Shall I go and ask one of my neighbours?

    After all their individual views reflect all Muslims.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    stuff
    Do Muslims hate lizards?

    Just wondering

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    When I go into the asian areas I now see asians with dogs. It okay for muslims to own dogs but they must not live with in the house. But I know that in Pakistan very rare to see a dog with an owner. Most are strays or guard dogs.

    Anyone think this is just a publicity stunt?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    So muslims don't like dogs.

    No some Malaysian Muslims don't like dogs.

    I personally grew up with people who were Muslim and had a pet dog. In one of the cases the dog would have been useless for security because it had a habit of jumping on people and licking them.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    I wonder what animals are 'clean'

    camels I suppose

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X