Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Child abducter bought to justice
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Child abducter bought to justice"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostNo he's not.
I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.
He's still talking tulip of course.
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTaking you child out for an ice cream is not abduction.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostNo he's not.
I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.
He's still talking tulip of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostTaking you child out for an ice cream is not abduction.
Though if you took a child out for an ice cream it would be abduction as you have none of your own.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostSo taking my own child out for ice cream when I shouldn't is as bad as raping them? That's what BP's claiming and what you're agreeing with. If you could avoid your brain turning off every time the word "child" appears this would be fairly obvious.
Though if you took a child out for an ice cream it would be abduction as you have none of your own.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostSo taking my own child out for ice cream when I shouldn't is as bad as raping them? That's what BP's claiming and what you're agreeing with. If you could avoid your brain turning off every time the word "child" appears this would be fairly obvious.
I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.
He's still talking tulip of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postbored and bruising for a fight then ?
a bit sad.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI take it you don't have children
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhy is it damaging? If you say "we're going on a trip together" and treat them well, how is that damaging?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostLeading question. But the wrong one.
I am concerned about taking a child away from the environment it is used to. And if a parent does it then it stops the other parent seeing the children.
There are clear international laws on this aka the Hague Convention. Even Zimbabwe signed up to it. This parent broke the law.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostOdd you feel that way. Kidnapping your own children is exactly the kind of thing I could picture you doing.
And it's clearly not the same thing.
Originally posted by speling bee View PostIs that because you are denying the other parent the right to see the child or because you are denying the child to see the other parent?
I am concerned about taking a child away from the environment it is used to. And if a parent does it then it stops the other parent seeing the children.
There are clear international laws on this aka the Hague Convention. Even Zimbabwe signed up to it. This parent broke the law.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostBBC News - 'Kidnap' mother Eileen Clark extradited to the US
The judge said the removal of children without parental consent was "a serious matter" and recognised as such by both domestic and foreign courts.
I hope the accused gets the same as Rolf Harris. Child abduction is tantamount to child abuse.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: