• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Child abducter bought to justice"

Collapse

  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But he did say this woman was as bad as Rolf.
    But he is mentally unhinged.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    No he's not.

    I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.

    He's still talking tulip of course.
    But he did say this woman was as bad as Rolf.

    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Taking you child out for an ice cream is not abduction.
    Didn't that woman kidnap her own children?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    No he's not.

    I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.

    He's still talking tulip of course.
    Both are illegal. Its hard to judge which is worse. I have always thought that mental crimes can be as bad as physical crimes.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Taking you child out for an ice cream is not abduction.

    Though if you took a child out for an ice cream it would be abduction as you have none of your own.

    HTH
    The fiend.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    So taking my own child out for ice cream when I shouldn't is as bad as raping them? That's what BP's claiming and what you're agreeing with. If you could avoid your brain turning off every time the word "child" appears this would be fairly obvious.
    Taking you child out for an ice cream is not abduction.

    Though if you took a child out for an ice cream it would be abduction as you have none of your own.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    So taking my own child out for ice cream when I shouldn't is as bad as raping them? That's what BP's claiming and what you're agreeing with. If you could avoid your brain turning off every time the word "child" appears this would be fairly obvious.
    No he's not.

    I think he's saying that there is an abduction continuum and a sexual assault continuum which are equivalent, so you can't compare the mild end of one with the most serious end of the other.

    He's still talking tulip of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    bored and bruising for a fight then ?



    a bit sad.
    So taking my own child out for ice cream when I shouldn't is as bad as raping them? That's what BP's claiming and what you're agreeing with. If you could avoid your brain turning off every time the word "child" appears this would be fairly obvious.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I take it you don't have children
    Social services make sure of that fact...

    The court exclusion order also helps..

    In reality I'm sure d000hg's wife is a teacher can definitely put some people off having their own children.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I take it you don't have children
    Got some chimney sweeping gigs?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why is it damaging? If you say "we're going on a trip together" and treat them well, how is that damaging?
    I take it you don't have children

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why is it damaging? If you say "we're going on a trip together" and treat them well, how is that damaging?
    bored and bruising for a fight then ?



    a bit sad.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I have never, and would never, kidnap my children. Its damaging for them.
    Why is it damaging? If you say "we're going on a trip together" and treat them well, how is that damaging?

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Leading question. But the wrong one.

    I am concerned about taking a child away from the environment it is used to. And if a parent does it then it stops the other parent seeing the children.

    There are clear international laws on this aka the Hague Convention. Even Zimbabwe signed up to it. This parent broke the law.
    Which is as serious as what Rolf Harris did?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Odd you feel that way. Kidnapping your own children is exactly the kind of thing I could picture you doing.

    And it's clearly not the same thing.
    I have never, and would never, kidnap my children. Its damaging for them. And I think they are the same thing.

    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    Is that because you are denying the other parent the right to see the child or because you are denying the child to see the other parent?
    Leading question. But the wrong one.

    I am concerned about taking a child away from the environment it is used to. And if a parent does it then it stops the other parent seeing the children.

    There are clear international laws on this aka the Hague Convention. Even Zimbabwe signed up to it. This parent broke the law.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    BBC News - 'Kidnap' mother Eileen Clark extradited to the US

    The judge said the removal of children without parental consent was "a serious matter" and recognised as such by both domestic and foreign courts.

    I hope the accused gets the same as Rolf Harris. Child abduction is tantamount to child abuse.
    Is that because you are denying the other parent the right to see the child or because you are denying the child to see the other parent?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X