further update
The amended contract was considered an IR35 pass by QDOS.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "QDOS say Hyphen contract is IR35 fail - anyone managed to get Hyphen to amend?"
Collapse
-
Go back to Dragonfly. The judge there was allowed to ignore the mismatch between upper and lower contracts. I said at the time that someone should have appealed that decision;it is a fundamental principle of contract law that you can't be bound by clauses you know nothing about. The opt out should not be embedded in the contract either.
Hyphen have history here, they are not in the least bit interested in acting ethically. Unless you really need the work, walk away and make sure your ex-client knows why.
Leave a comment:
-
If you can't get the contract amended to include an unfettered RoS clause that is more than a mere sham, then not all is lost. Whilst a genuine RoS is pretty much a surefire way of fighting off an IR35 investigation, you can still be outside without it if you can clearly show a lack of MOO and/or D&C. It might be easier to cover your bases with these rather than try and get a RoS clause inserted that probably wouldn't be honoured anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostHaving a sham clause in the contract which says there is no right of substitution when the client would in reality accept one wouldn't help your situation, either.
Get the best contract you can and try as hard as possible to make the reality reflect the wording. In the event of an IR35 investigation, I'd rather have a friendly contract which HMRC have to prove is a sham than a dodgy contract (which has already been rejected by an expert) that I then have to prove doesn't match the reality.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostHmm, I don't really like the sound of that. Just altering wording to get past a review isn't going to help anyone, particularly if that extra wording doesn't match the reality of the situation. Having sham clauses in is going to cause more of a headache than solve anything surely?
Get the best contract you can and try as hard as possible to make the reality reflect the wording. In the event of an IR35 investigation, I'd rather have a friendly contract which HMRC have to prove is a sham than a dodgy contract (which has already been rejected by an expert) that I then have to prove doesn't match the reality.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Casablanca View PostHyphen have replied that they have a "QDOS specific addendum" which will be added to my contract by COB today. I am interested to see what that says. I presume it has been drafted in response to other people's contract reviews
Leave a comment:
-
Spoke with brother at the weekend. He runs the account with one of the big IBs and said that their contracts reflect the clients', and that in their case there's just an opt out check-box at the bottom of the contract.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostMakes you wonder why they don't include it by standard.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Casablanca View PostHyphen have replied that they have a "QDOS specific addendum" which will be added to my contract by COB today. I am interested to see what that says. I presume it has been drafted in response to other people's contract reviews
Leave a comment:
-
update
Hyphen have replied that they have a "QDOS specific addendum" which will be added to my contract by COB today. I am interested to see what that says. I presume it has been drafted in response to other people's contract reviews
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Contreras View PostTrue. The client won't want to lose their chosen contractor and the agent won't want to lose their commission. It does beg the question why opt-out and then withdraw at the last minute, instead of negotiating the contract terms appropriately.
OK I can see how that is one tactic, but it could backfire too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAs long as the client is dumb it is within your right to tell them what's going on and explain the advantages to them of not opting-out.Originally posted by speling bee View PostBut your foot is in the client's door so you have the upper hand.
OK I can see how that is one tactic, but it could backfire too.Last edited by Contreras; 12 June 2014, 21:04.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Contreras View PostDoes it? I thought the opt-out agreement lasts for the duration of any subsequent contract. You can withdraw your agreement to the opt-out at any time but then the agency is within rights to cancel the contract and offer to renew with the opt-in version (or not at all).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Contreras View PostDoes it? I thought the opt-out agreement lasts for the duration of any subsequent contract. You can withdraw your agreement to the opt-out at any time but then the agency is within rights to cancel the contract and offer to renew with the opt-in version (or not at all).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostOr:
[*]accept the opt-out contract, sign the opt-out, withdraw the opt-out an hour before you start the contract and then declare yourself outside IR35 and prove that the reality puts you outside.
Or does that not work? I forget.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: