• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Does control influence whether an engagement is one of for service or of service ?"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by kal View Post
    So who does this Rory geezer work for?, would like to know as I wouldn't want to waste my time dealing with either him or his employer professionally, plenty of pimps out there and my preference is always to work with the least objectionable ones...
    Oracle Contractors I think. But you should appreciate his honest approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    Originally posted by Rory Dwyer View Post

    As previously stated, the ramifications of this situation forced CNL to cease trading with significant losses borne by the owners.
    Originally posted by kal View Post
    So who does this Rory geezer work for?, would like to know as I wouldn't want to waste my time dealing with either him or his employer professionally, plenty of pimps out there and my preference is always to work with the least objectionable ones...
    No one, apparently...

    Leave a comment:


  • kal
    replied
    So who does this Rory geezer work for?, would like to know as I wouldn't want to waste my time dealing with either him or his employer professionally, plenty of pimps out there and my preference is always to work with the least objectionable ones...

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Maybe just stand closer?
    Not sure I have the app for that

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    The only diagnosis I have so far is my camera needs a bigger zoom factor
    Maybe just stand closer?

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Make sure you get a proper diagnosis.
    The only diagnosis I have so far is my camera needs a bigger zoom factor

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Of course - photo sent.
    Make sure you get a proper diagnosis.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Of course - photo sent.
    And you

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I think you've got yourself a new signature, Lisa.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Would you let me see it? [email protected]
    Of course - photo sent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Would you let me see it? [email protected]
    I think you've got yourself a new signature, Lisa.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by Rory Dwyer View Post
    I have a written copy of the judgement but no link
    Would you let me see it? [email protected]

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    The answer is clearly 42.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Rory Dwyer View Post
    Adios
    This makes me glum

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Rory Dwyer View Post
    Okay, no problem, we will agree to disagree. My goal was to bring the issue to your attention and then to walk through the reasoning behind the judgements.

    Whether you wish to agree or disagree with that reasoning, is completely your choice and one that I respect your right to make.

    There will be many further readers of this thread who can make their own decisions, one way or another.

    I feel I have achieved the purpose of bringing this issue to your attention.

    My job is done here.

    Best of luck with your future. I have enjoyed sparring with you.

    Adios
    Good move.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X